Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They

Essay topics:

Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.

The above arguments fails to provide any practical evidence of the topic it is trying to argue upon. It just tries to resemble the way people used to live centuries ago and their diets instead of pointing out the current situations.

The writer fails to give any real life example who have observed the effects of the diets which were followed thousands of years ago. Considering the time differences there are huge number of changes related to how people eat and perform their chores. Genetics have evolved us to adapt to the changing environments and it is impossible for anyone to follow the routine or habits of our ancestors who used to have a complete different routine.

Comparing the effects of such diets to today's world doesn't mean that the same effects might be observed by the people of today's world. There have been considerable amount of changes both mentally and physically about how people live today and how they used to live thousands of years ago. It might be possible that in today's world eating such diets may give rise to a number of disease which then were easily digested by our ancestors.

Even as of today, diet might have alternate options such as vegans, instead of just depending on animals for their nutrients. Also writer believes that they might be health-promoting, but is not confident about in which ways or also do not provide an insight on how and what do they contain per gram weight of such bones.

Also based on above argument, it might be true that as compared to today's lifestyle which only consists of diets which include huge amounts of calories and carbs, ancestral diets methods might seem to add some protein and other essential nutrients. But it seems to be contradictory that emulating the way they ate might solve our day to day problems or illness.

At the end I would like to conclude by saying that instead of just believing in something based on assumptions and claims, people should focus on following a healthy diet which suits them based on their lifestyles. As far as above argument is considered, writer must explicitly specify the exact figures or some practical examples to prove his point that adapting to such Paleo diets might reduce illness and promote healthy environments.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 jason123 69 view
2020-01-25 Chayank_11 57 view
2020-01-07 hyunjulia99 75 view
2019-12-29 neha1980 50 view
2019-12-13 noitsimani 61 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user solankis304 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'fail'.
Suggestion: fail
The above arguments fails to provide any practical evidence of th...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e effects of such diets to todays world doesnt mean that the same effects might be obs...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...pending on animals for their nutrients. Also writer believes that they might be heal...
^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ain per gram weight of such bones. Also based on above argument, it might be tr...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 385.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88311688312 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53617444317 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522077922078 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8785776813 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.285714286 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.324526521 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64285714286 5.70786347227 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0912911075684 0.218282227539 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357646617178 0.0743258471296 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273368832396 0.0701772020484 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0482275018509 0.128457276422 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300583036258 0.0628817314937 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.3550499002 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.197005988 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 386 350
No. of Characters: 1833 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.432 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.749 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.479 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.169 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.357 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.666 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5