"To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate. Moreover, the average rent for an apartment in our town has risen in recent years. Consequently, students will find it increasingly difficult to afford off-campus housing. Finally, attractive new dormitories would make prospective students more likely to enroll at Buckingham."
While Buckingham Collage want to build new dormitories for students, however it can't be concluded from presented argument. Argument is rife of holes and assumptions. It states that Buckingham Collage should build new dormitories to serve housing need for students because Buckingham's enrollment is growing and will double in next 50 year, based on current trends, and housing in the city is expensive and difficult to afford for students. Author concluded that attractive new dormitories will attract new student to Buckingham.
Data is missing about increasing enrollment of students based on current trends. What current trends author is considering, is it current year data only or it includes data is collected and compared from past few years to study growing number of students. It is not very cogent from the argument that if enrollment will double in next 50 years, then college need to build new dormitories now only. There is no information presented that show if currently enrolled students are facing housing problems or not. More information required to check whether number of enrolling students percentage is similar to students who are graduating from college or it is more, how much more. This information will be helpful to understand how severe housing problem is.
Author assumes that if average rent of an apartment has risen in the city then students might face hardship in affording off-campus housing. In the argument housing rent in the city is not compared with the on-campus housing to show which one is currently more expensive for students. Students might want to share off-campus apartment which might be cheaper than living on-campus. There could be a possibility that all the apartment buildings are not expensive, some buildings might not be luxurious and can be cheaper or students might get student discount on renting apartment.
There is a contradiction in the argument Buckingham's enrollment is growing and it will be double in next 50 years and new dormitories will make prospective students to enroll. If Students enrollment is already growing then why college need to make extra efforts to attract students.
There is no analysis shown in the argument, what students want, whether they like to stay on campus or off campus. Data is also missing about out of total enrolled students, how many need housing. There could is possibility that most of the enrolled students in the college are from same city or neighboring cities who don't need housing.
From above analysis, it is very clear that build new dormitories just because students enrollment is going to increase in future can't be concluded. More information need to gathered and analyzed and there are many open ended questions required to be answered. Above analysis can make argument weak, therefore conclusion largely has to be supported by more concrete data, not on surmises.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | aniketnichat | 39 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | abhishekp2301 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | p30kh40 | 33 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | Ghader | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | SOUMEDHIK | 43 | view |
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 66
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twic 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores. "Five years ago Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly. Their stores saw sales increase by 15 percent after their ads began appearing in th 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ew dormitories for students, however it cant be concluded from presented argument. A...
^^^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ew dormitories for students, however it cant be concluded from presented argument. A...
^^^^
Line 9, column 210, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...nts, how many need housing. There could is possibility that most of the enrolled s...
^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rom same city or neighboring cities who dont need housing. From above analysis, ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 130, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rollment is going to increase in future cant be concluded. More information need to ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239520958084 0.25644967241 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.213572854291 0.15541462614 137% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107784431138 0.0836205057962 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0518962075848 0.0520304965353 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0179640718563 0.0272364105082 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121756487026 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.061876247505 0.0416121511921 149% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77156203545 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0379241516966 0.026700313972 142% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0359281437126 0.113004496875 32% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0319361277445 0.0255425247493 125% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0199600798403 0.0127820249294 156% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2892.0 2731.13054187 106% => OK
No of words: 466.0 446.07635468 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20600858369 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.57801047555 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37982832618 0.378187486979 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.336909871245 0.287650121315 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.238197424893 0.208842608468 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156652360515 0.135150697306 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77156203545 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 207.018472906 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427038626609 0.469332199767 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.3726897602 52.1807786196 91% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.039408867 110% => OK
Sentence length: 21.1818181818 23.2022227129 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.145183328 57.7814097925 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 141.986410481 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 23.2022227129 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.363636363636 0.724660767414 50% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 54.8728053063 51.9672348444 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.49295774648 1.8405768891 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380312649499 0.441005458295 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144316248387 0.135418324435 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0930883525067 0.0829849096947 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.560290182626 0.58762219726 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.125294309174 0.147661913831 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148851201037 0.193483328276 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871305321318 0.0970749176394 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.274693991355 0.42659136922 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.07715819126 0.0774707102158 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247732119263 0.312017818177 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100054931383 0.0698173142475 143% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.87684729064 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 5.36822660099 205% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 14.657635468 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.