Several recent studies have shown a link between health and stair usage. One recently completed study shows that people who live in stairs-only apartment buildings (that is, buildings without elevators) live an average of three years longer than do people who live in buildings with both elevators and stairs. A second study shows that elderly residents of buildings with elevators make, on average, twice as many visits to doctors each year as do residents of buildings without elevators. Furthermore, several doctor's offices are reporting that residents of stairs-only buildings scored higher than average on questionnaires administered to new patients, in which the patients were asked to rate several aspects of their own health (e.g., fitness, sleep quality, susceptibility to injury, etc.). The clearest explanation for these findings is that the moderate daily exercise required of residents who must use the stairs instead of elevators increases people's health and longevity.
The authors claim which is supported by several recent searches and study that there is a link between health and stair usage is proven and a fact which is accepted widely. Physical excercise for the betterment of human health is very important. To improve our health we daily do many fitness activities such as yoga, walking, running etc. After we reach a certain old age in our life we can be healthy when we are accustomed to such kind of activities. By practising these activities daily we can find our body in a proper condition.
But we generally get so involved in our busy schedules and lives that we find it difficult to take out some life and use it to do these activities which can probably kill some of our valuable time. For instance, in such scenarios using stair cases instead of elevators and lifts are very useful and improves our health in one way or the other. As the author already said that many study "s have already proven this fact. When tested under many factors such as fitness, sleep quality, susceptibility to injury, etc they founded a conclusion that that the moderate daily exercise required of residents who must use the stairs instead of elevators increases people's health and longevity. Consider an example where one have no lift or elevator in the building he/she lives, in such an instance he/she is left with no other option than to use the stair case which could be painful for that moment but initially that results in the good of that person.
Hence in conclusion, the authors assertion supported by reasonable facts and researches which are reasonably enough to speak for itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Moustafa Noufale | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Adebayo | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | omarsamiiir | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | robrt97 | 42 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | aneela | 23 | view |
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 66
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 23
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 50
- Several recent studies have shown a link between health and stair usage. One recently completed study shows that people who live in stairs-only apartment buildings (that is, buildings without elevators) live an average of three years longer than do people 23
- claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. reason: only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Out of topic.
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1317 1500
No. of Different Words: 163 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.637 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.454 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 45 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.847 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.376 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.549 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.178 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun study seems to be countable; consider using: 'many studies'.
Suggestion: many studies
... other. As the author already said that many study 's have already proven this fact. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 546, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...o injury, etc they founded a conclusion that that the moderate daily exercise required of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...t results in the good of that person. Hence in conclusion, the authors assertion su...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...that person. Hence in conclusion, the authors assertion supported by reasonable facts...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hes which are reasonably enough to speak for itself.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 2260.96107784 60% => OK
No of words: 282.0 441.139720559 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81205673759 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50644759838 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2105332311 57.8364921388 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.363636364 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.70786347227 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182343420897 0.218282227539 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630410389381 0.0743258471296 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596434831158 0.0701772020484 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956198166249 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07477673785 0.0628817314937 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.