Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances, such as refrigerators and air conditioners, that are almost twice as energy efficient as those sold a decade ago. Also, new technologies for better home insulation and passive solar heating are readily available to reduce the energy needed for home heating. Therefore, the total demand for electricity in our area will not increase — and may decline slightly. Since our three electric generating plants in operation for the past twenty years have always met our needs, construction of new generating plants will not be necessary.
The writer of the argument concludes that the total demand for electricity in writer’s area will not increase since three electric generating plants are pleased their demands, and in this order there is no need to construct a new plant because of some main reasons: several surveys has just shown that home owners are enthusiasm to maintain energy, manufacturers decide to sell many home appliances with more energy efficiency, and new technologies are taking apart in saving energy consuming which is needed for home heating; however this conclusion cannot be confirmed as it is in that it rests on a number of promises all of which can be challenged in one way or another.
The first problem with the argument is that the writer refers to several surveys but not indicate how many people participate in each survey reported. As you know, in research surveys the greater the number of the people in the sample, the more reliable and valid the findings are. Maybe in these surveys only ten people took apart; hence, the findings of such surveys are neither reliable nor valid. Even if it is assumed that adequate people participated in, there is still another problem with the sample. In a research survey, the findings can be generalized to the target population if the sample used is representative of the concerned population in terms of age, sex, social class, culture, etc.; however, in this argument there is no evidence to illustrate whether the sample used was representative of the target population or not. It follows that the findings of these surveys cannot be applied to the member of the population without reservations.
Another issue with the argument is that the writer assumes that manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances that are almost two times as energy efficient as those sold a decade ago. This sentence can merely crash the argument to destruction. First of all, the writer mentioned manufacturers but there is no testimony how many are they? Maybe there are just 3 manufacturers that are marketing new home appliances with better energy efficiency. Even if it is assumed that all manufacturers are doing this change, there is still another problem with this change. Are all the people able to change their home appliances and renew them? Of course not! The second problem with this sentence is that the writer said “twice as energy efficient as” which this announcement does not delivery that more efficient devices use less electricity. Maybe these more efficient devices like refrigerators can just maintain foods fresh for more days than the previous ones can do. Therefore, these statements cannot come up with less electricity consuming.
A third problem with the argument is that the writer purposes that things remain the same over twenty years. However, in most cases this is not true. Twenty years ago, some devices such as laptops, dishwashers, TVs, and etc. were not existed in wide range that they are now. In this order, they consumed less electricity than they are utilizing now. Hence, not only the number of these devices has been increased, but also they utilize more electricity base on their increase in number.
In the final analysis, the writer’s conclusion cannot be taken to be correct because, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above, it depends on a number of assumptions each of which is questionable. The conclusion can only be accepted if the weakness already referred to are all removed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | stevewang1007 | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Daffodilia | 81 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | samira@ | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Ramkal | 42 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Noma Ahmad | 16 | view |
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 3
- Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. 65
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 73
- Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 82
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 577 350
No. of Characters: 2822 1500
No. of Different Words: 244 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.901 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.891 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.632 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 199 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 142 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.08 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.556 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.64 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.278 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.47 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The writer of the argument concludes tha...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be challenged in one way or another. The first problem with the argument is t...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the population without reservations. Another issue with the argument is that ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e up with less electricity consuming. A third problem with the argument is tha...
^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ices such as laptops, dishwashers, TVs, and etc. were not existed in wide range that the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty base on their increase in number. In the final analysis, the writer's...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, of course, such as, you know, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 42.0 19.6327345309 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 28.8173652695 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2915.0 2260.96107784 129% => OK
No of words: 577.0 441.139720559 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05199306759 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.56307096286 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73326324986 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 204.123752495 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445407279029 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 936.9 705.55239521 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 127.605940464 57.8364921388 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 121.458333333 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0416666667 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95833333333 5.70786347227 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187033754998 0.218282227539 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513567539735 0.0743258471296 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062293529678 0.0701772020484 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924518598662 0.128457276422 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647430776076 0.0628817314937 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 98.500998004 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 12.3882235529 460% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.