The author of presented article argues that Adams reality is superior to Fitch Reality but does not provide substantial persuasive evidence to support his claim. His conclusion is based on certain underlying assumptions which if unwarranted can affect it’s validity.
The author conveys that Adams Realty has more agents than Fitch Realty to support his claim. However, more number of agents does not substantiate that services provided by Adams are better than Fitch Realty. If the agents at Fitch Realty have better skills and are more effective and efficient, author’s claim would be fallacious. The author also cites that most of the agents at Fitch work part time but this can make the agents more efficient as they would be having bigger social circles helping them to sell the homes quickly.
Furthermore, revenue of both firms is compared. The revenue of Adams reality is twice that of Fitch. It is possible that the additional revenue if Adams reality is coming from other services such as construction, renting which Fitch realty may not be involved in. Author provides no in formation regarding the set of services provided by both firms. Moreover higher revenues and higher average selling price does imply that per home profit for Adams is higher as compared to Fitch. Higher per house selling price may mean that Adams Reality is only involved in dealing of high value houses. It does not substantiate the services provided by Adams are superior as compared to Fitch.
Author maintains that Adams Reality sells home in lesser time than Fitch Realty by citing his personal experience in which he was able to sell his home faster with Adams Realty last year as compared to the one with Fitch Realty ten years ago. However is not rational to compare these two events which are separated by nearly a decade. The real state market condition may have been very different to what it was ten years ago. Also it is possible that home sold last year was in much better condition than that sold ten years ago. Moreover author provides no information regarding the profitability of his deal with the two real estate firms, which would have been a better indicator of the performance of the two real state firms.
Conclusively, author’s claim lacks the persuasive evidence to support his claim of the superiority of Adams Realty over Fitch Realty. With each enumerated argument being potentially unwarranted, the conclusion which is based on such a inconclusive argument is not defensible.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 60
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twic 58
- We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening th 50
- To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate. 83
- On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...on certain underlying assumptions which if unwarranted can affect it’s validity. ...
^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...mptions which if unwarranted can affect it’s validity. The author conveys that Ad...
^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...s that most of the agents at Fitch work part time but this can make the agents more effic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...may not be involved in. Author provides no in formation regarding the set of servi...
^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...et of services provided by both firms. Moreover higher revenues and higher average sell...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and higher average selling price does imply that per home profit for Adams is ...
^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...hat per home profit for Adams is higher as compared to Fitch. Higher per house se...
^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Realty last year as compared to the one with Fitch Realty ten years ago. However...
^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e one with Fitch Realty ten years ago. However is not rational to compare these two ev...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 428, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...different to what it was ten years ago. Also it is possible that home sold last year...
^^^^
Line 7, column 533, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ondition than that sold ten years ago. Moreover author provides no information regardin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e two real state firms. Conclusively, author’s claim lacks the persuasive evi...
^^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...state firms. Conclusively, author’s claim lacks the persuasive evidence to s...
^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
..., the conclusion which is based on such a inconclusive argument is not defensible...
^
Line 9, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nconclusive argument is not defensible.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273755656109 0.25644967241 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.174208144796 0.15541462614 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.115384615385 0.0836205057962 138% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0588235294118 0.0520304965353 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0316742081448 0.0272364105082 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128959276018 0.125424944231 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0588235294118 0.0416121511921 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53979332868 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0248868778281 0.026700313972 93% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0701357466063 0.113004496875 62% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0180995475113 0.0255425247493 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0180995475113 0.0127820249294 142% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2517.0 2731.13054187 92% => OK
No of words: 415.0 446.07635468 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06506024096 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.57801047555 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.366265060241 0.378187486979 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.240963855422 0.287650121315 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171084337349 0.208842608468 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101204819277 0.135150697306 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53979332868 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 207.018472906 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440963855422 0.469332199767 94% => OK
Word variations: 47.3327862043 52.1807786196 91% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.75 23.2022227129 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6085383446 57.7814097925 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.85 141.986410481 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 23.2022227129 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.724660767414 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 3.58251231527 419% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 44.8463855422 51.9672348444 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.74358974359 1.8405768891 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405190057375 0.441005458295 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152826810276 0.135418324435 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.127936285934 0.0829849096947 154% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528999407299 0.58762219726 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117524729344 0.147661913831 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151469603628 0.193483328276 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853342229161 0.0970749176394 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.283482090237 0.42659136922 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.046369369856 0.0774707102158 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24293391991 0.312017818177 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716717617103 0.0698173142475 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.33743842365 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 6.46551724138 170% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.