Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa

Essay topics:

Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

The passage states that “Palean” wooden baskets, previously thougt to be made exclusively by people from the ancient village Palea, were also made by residents of a nearby village called Lithos. The premisis of this conclusion is that the Brim River, which divides these two villages, is too broad to be crossed without a boat and no Palean boat have been found. However, the conclusion depends on a number of assumtions, so additional evidence is needed in order to evaluate it.

Firstly, the depth and width of the Brim River might have changed since the days when the “Palean” baskets were made. It is widely known that sometimes rivers may change their width, so it is worth considering if in the era of Palea and Lithos the Brim River looked the same way as it looks now. Maybe, it was possible to cross it by swimming at that time. More data on geographical changes in the area is needed to find out if the people living in Palea could swim to Lithos.

Secondly, it is assumed that crossing the river was possible only in one place. However, some rives have places where thay are more shallow or less wide than usual. If it is the case with the Brim river, it is possible that Palean people were able to cross the river by swimmimg at some other place. It would explain how they managed to bring the wooden baskets to Lithos. Thus, additional information on the places where the river is less deep and wide is needed to make sure that the argument holds.

Thirdly, the passage presupposes that the absence of remaints of Palen boats means that no Palean boat ever existed. However, it is possible that, during the time passed since th days of Palea and Lithos, these remaints were lost or destroyed. It is quite probable that they were made from wood, and wood is a material what is susceptible to erosion. It means that even if there were Palean boats, they could be destroyed by the time. Moreover, the Palean people might have decided that they don’t need these boats anymore and use the wood from which they were made for some other purpose. Another possibility is that these boats might have been destroyed by fire. Additional research is needed to find out if the residents of Palea used boats. For example, it is possible to check pictures from that time or examine if the boats were mentioned in some texts written then.

To sum up, the argument above appears flawed and additional research is needed to evaluate if the conclusion is correct. It is recommendable to check how the Brim River changed during the time passed and whether it had places where it was possible to cross it without a boat. Furthermore, it is necessary to establish if there are mentions of excistence of Palean boats.

Votes
Average: 4.3 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-09 M1randa 55 view
2023-08-06 yuktapradeep 55 view
2023-07-30 Vivi5428 66 view
2023-07-30 Vivi5428 68 view
2023-07-09 ZHOU0444 16 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user kier :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e exclusively by people from the ancient village Palea, were also made by residen...
^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sometimes rivers may change their width, so it is worth considering if in the era...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, for example, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.6327345309 204% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 13.6137724551 154% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 28.8173652695 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 481.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50409219843 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 204.123752495 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442827442827 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 715.5 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5340041517 57.8364921388 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1304347826 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9130434783 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13043478261 5.70786347227 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.67664670659 299% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175877429204 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518450202168 0.0743258471296 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447061264662 0.0701772020484 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988841888334 0.128457276422 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572925781288 0.0628817314937 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.3799401198 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.5979740519 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

argument 1 -- not OK

argument 2 -- duplicated to argument 1

argument 3 -- better to say: maybe people in Lithos have boats.
--------------------

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 482 350
No. of Characters: 2171 1500
No. of Different Words: 206 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.686 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.504 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.276 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.957 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.557 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.739 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.31 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.502 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5