Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu

Essay topics:

Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at this dramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.

The author concludes that Omega University should terminate student evaluations of professors, because it was observed that after the evaluation had been introduced, professors were assigning higher grades to the students. Employers saw this increase in scores as inflated and considered them not accurate reflections of the students' potential. Although, this seems like a logical argument at first, certain evidence needs to be provided to justify its validity.

Firstly, the argument implies that the professors gave a higher grade to students so as to get a better evaluation. The increase in g...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 9 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-15 kamyar.sa 10 view
2021-09-18 AnishPal view
2021-07-11 tejarayala 70 view
2021-01-27 MeccaQuotes 93 view
2013-11-15 avinash 49 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user rohitnim :

Comments

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 438 350
No. of Characters: 2251 1500
No. of Different Words: 192 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.575 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.139 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.776 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 176 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 142 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 117 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 64 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.046 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.762 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.559 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.082 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5