Advancement in a field of study and outside experts.
At present, a particular topic or an area of study is taught in more detail than ever and various domains of knowledge are inextricably linked with each other. The prompt says that experts from another field are needed for advancement in a particular field of study. I strongly agree with the view as the nature of studying a particular area is no longer simple, rather extremely intertwined.
Consider how a cultural anthropologist’s knowledge of an ancient civilization is enhanced not only by the expertise of an archaeologist- who unearths the evidence- but also by geologists, biochemists, linguists and even astronomers. By analyzing the evidence found, a geologist can help identify the material used for making tools, weapons etc. Similarly, biochemists and foreign experts can explore the cause of death, eating habits, general well-being and preservation process of dead bodies etc. by analyzing the hair, nail, teeth, and skin of a mummified body. This information in turn enables an anthropologist to extrapolate the overall lifestyle, trade, economy, work habit, technology, the extent of travel and so forth of the ancient civilization. Linguists are needed to decipher the writings or any documents of the ancient era, which in turn help to predict the cultural traits, literature, religion etc. of that era. And even astronomers could be of help as they are the experts who can find out the positioning of tombs, temples, and monuments since the ancient people used to fix places for such establishments with the help of stars.
An even more fascinating example of how the expertise of discrete fields is needed to advance a particular field is Astronomy. To carry out research and exploration in this area very delicate equipment and instruments are necessary. For instance, the telescope is a very keen tool for an astronomer and it is the engineers who should be lauded for the invention of the telescope. By using a telescope an astronomer explores and measures celestial distances, masses, volumes etc. which are actually the domain of astrophysicists. Similarly, many manned and unmanned probes are sent to space for astronomic exploration. However, the probes and the required software and technology come from different fields like computer, mechanical and aeronautical engineering. Again, to initiate any space project there is a need for acumen and savvy of business, political and economic leaders. It is their efforts that help to associate budget and necessary preconditions for making space projects successful. Even diplomats play a crucial role in this area as many giant space projects are the result of collaborative action by various nations.
Overall, the area of a particular subject or topic is so vast and interlinked with other domains that it is a precondition to utilize the interplay among different fields to advance in a particular field. Without the synchronization of discrete fields, progress may hinder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-05 | Shreya Singh | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero 66
- Advancement in a field of study and outside experts 83
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before it means putting old ideas together in new ways 50
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before it means putting old ideas together in new ways 50
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before it means putting old ideas together in new ways 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2491.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31130063966 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13362479956 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6461598547 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.304347826 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3913043478 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13043478261 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163402349386 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426036162359 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806484400948 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120752505183 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766196433764 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.