Statistics show companies who hire consultants churn out more incredible results. I strongly disagree with the topic with the three following reasons
Firstly, A consultant is one who is a specialist, that is, he is one who has a wide range of experience and thus expertise in solving specific problems. When companies employ workers they do so with the intention of having them solve not only their job specific issues but also other relating job roles, therefore most workers in a work space have to take on more than one job specification making them have a wide range of skillset which makes the skills they put into their works generic rather than problem specific, for example in some west African countries employers put a job vacancy say content manager who is just supposed to manage the nature of contents that goes out from the company, will have the job specification to include the content creation, content writing, graphic designer which the makes the
Another reason is, Whenever there is a problem, A consultant most of the times introduces a fresh, foreign perspective that is born from a wide range of experience to solving problems that even if the employees didn't consider because they are used to solving problems only a particular way within the company. Flexibility as they say is crucial ski
For example, if someone works as a seismic interpreter for example where
On the contrary, one may want to consider the cost implications of hiring a consultant and then suggest hat the company instead spend that amount in training their employees in specific fields so that they can also get the specified skills offered by the consultant, that might be somewhat valid but however it is important to note that the consultant will not be needed on an everyday basis
IN summary the role of a consultant cannot be overestimated and thus companies should rather hire consultants to operate more efficiently
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiency If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ing problems that even if the employees didnt consider because they are used to solvi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Flexibility as they say is crucial ski For example, if someone works as a seism...
^^^
Line 6, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a seismic interpreter for example where On the contrary, one may want to conside...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trary, one may want to consider the cost implications of hiring a consultant and ...
^^
Line 8, column 298, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...onsultant, that might be somewhat valid but however it is important to note that the consul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will not be needed on an everyday basis IN summary the role of a consultant cann...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in summary, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99380804954 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72743293834 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560371517028 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 80.0 23.0359550562 347% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 353.49283939 60.3974514979 585% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 403.25 118.986275619 339% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 80.75 23.4991977007 344% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 28.0 5.21951772744 536% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247556834057 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174316302474 0.0831039109588 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122175800769 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154057423609 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10906428908 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 42.4 14.1392134831 300% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -9.72 48.8420337079 -20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 34.5 12.1743820225 283% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.85 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.56 8.38706741573 138% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 34.0 11.2143820225 303% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.