All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Is outside counsel really effective? some might argue that listening only to people working within a company is the best approach but others would believe getting someone or people who do not benefit from the current system or people who have not been clouded by the way the current system is should be a more effective way of moving the company to greater heights.
Those who believe that getting consultants to advise them or giving them other insights is a waste of time can be right to do so, as a matter of fact, they are the ones on the boat who have been facing the storms and whirlwind all this while and the boat has not capsized but people outside a situation always give better advise than people within the system because they look at matters affecting the company with keen interests that the people who work in the company might in a million years think of, for instance during the 2002 FIFA world cup Final in which Brazil won, the coach had to call other coaches from other countries who have beaten that squad they were about to face and seek new strategies they could use to win the match, which eventually worked out for them.
Another case is IBM who host an annual conference for its staff and invite various business leaders from all over the world to advise their staffs on how to maximise their potentials and this conference has been an integral part of the success story of this great company, this company is old and should have stopped working by now but the new ideas that keep coming from these consultants has helped IBM to be equipped to transend or sail through this fast pacind technological revolution, if this company has depended on just its employees alone, there would be a time, they would run out of ideas and the growth of the company would pause and if it continues it like that, other competititors with fresh ideas would overtake them.
In conclusion, seeking consultants to give advise or sharing their experience on how they were able to solve similar problems or telling them what to do in case they find themselves in one situation or the other is never a waste of time, moreover if listening to their own employees alone was enough, then getting outside counsels wouldn't have been neccessary and a saying nobody is an island of knowlege cut across all facets of life including companies.
ULtimately, IBM seeking for consultants yearly to improve their company and the Brazilian coach getting others with experience helped them achieve their goals, if it works then it should be implemented but does that mean listening to employees alone is not effective? No, it isn't, the only problem is everyone runs out of ideas at one point in time, so this outside counsels are always neededed for continuous growth.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- People most respect the powerful not when they exercise their power but when they refrain from exercising it Write an essay in which you develop and support a position on the statement above In writing your essay you should consider both when the statemen 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
Is outside counsel really effective? some might argue that listening only to peop...
^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...n clouded by the way the current system is should be a more effective way of movin...
^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advice' (a noun)?
Suggestion: advice
...conclusion, seeking consultants to give advise or sharing their experience on how they...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s enough, then getting outside counsels wouldnt have been neccessary and a saying nobod...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...mployees alone is not effective? No, it isnt, the only problem is everyone runs out ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, really, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70454545455 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.365336144 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49173553719 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 69.0 23.0359550562 300% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 260.425867865 60.3974514979 431% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 325.285714286 118.986275619 273% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 69.1428571429 23.4991977007 294% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.7142857143 5.21951772744 301% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25226863037 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121181418333 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515129061839 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150958877647 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251889357159 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.3 14.1392134831 250% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 18.36 48.8420337079 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.8 12.1743820225 228% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.16 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 29.6 11.2143820225 264% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 11.7820224719 255% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.