Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A leader encompasses multiple qualities like boldness, good judgement, humility, etc. to be deemed a noble leader. One cannot discriminate between the different attributes that define a leader. The prompt says that, respecting peers is an important required characteristic compared to moral judgement. In my opinion, I agree with this claim for three reasons.
To begin with, a leader is the most important person in a room and sets the benchmark within the group. If he maintains humilty, stays deferential towards his peers, the same would be reciprocated by the rest of the group and maintains a healthy ecosystem in which everyone thrives. Suppose he is known for his invective behaviour, then the environment won't be conducive to inoculative ideas. The above example illustrates the importance of a leader's role in overall development of the group.
Further, moral judgement under difficult situations may not be as catastrophic as compared to the repurcussions of snide attitude. For example , a respectful manager who has to nominate an individual for an award from his team would talk and consult with his peers to determine to deserving candidate. Whereas , a vile manager may nominate a servile individual or end up nominating himself which he totally doesn't deserve. It shows the importance of how having your peer support is much more relevant than being a lone vile wolf.
To add to the above statement, one might argue that the moral decisions taken might have psychological impact because of the juxtapose of the situation. But disrespecting your subjects or peers may have a psychological impact on multiple people which is totally not acceptable.
Civility and humility are the foundational stones for a happy and a thriving environment and these characteristics help in the development of not only the individual , but also the whole group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 16
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 54
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies 66
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...example illustrates the importance of a leaders role in overall development of the grou...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rcussions of snide attitude. For example , a respectful manager who has to nominat...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...etermine to deserving candidate. Whereas , a vile manager may nominate a servile i...
^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... up nominating himself which he totally doesnt deserve. It shows the importance of how...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ht have psychological impact because of the juxtapose of the situation. But disrespecting you...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e development of not only the individual , but also the whole group.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, whereas, as to, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26845637584 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09807745325 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607382550336 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2499537722 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244195437405 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746298914237 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553358935762 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116410782831 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687185570329 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.