Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Leaders can bring about great revolution. They can either be the tools that usher humanity into a better era, like Martin Luther King, or those who bring about generations of suffering and inflict terrible pain, like Adolf Hitler. Since they hold immense power, I believe that the most important quality of an effective leader is having a sound moral character.
A good leader is one who creates a good example. He must always strive to do the right thing, because only then will the organization be morally sound. For any company to build the trust of their customers, it is essential that they follow business practices that are fair and do not adversely affect society. If the leader himself does not live up to that standard, it is unlikely that his peers will. This will eventually lead to the organization crumbling as a result of their duplicitous business practices.
Furthermore, having a sound moral character is infinitely more important than being able to command the respect of your peers. Everyone in your team may respect you, but unless you have a morally sound goal, your efforts will be in vain. In fact, they may cause more destruction and lead to society actually being worse off! Consider the example of Adolf Hitler - many will argue that he was a brilliant commander, and almost everyone will agree he had the respect of his peers. However, he led to the execution of hundreds of thousands of Jews, and his massacres are still considered to be one of the worst crises humanity ever had to suffer, hundreds of years later.
It is true that a leader will only be able to keep his peers motivated if they feel a sense of unity, and towards that end, they need to be able to respect their leader. If they don't respect their leader, they might always have a residual feeling that they could have done the job better. Although this might reduce productivity, they are better off this way rather than having a leader that has negative and malicious intent.
Therefore, it is extremely crucial for a leader to be of sound moral judgement, even more so than his ability to maintain the respect of his peers. If not, disastrous results may ensue, and entire generations may have to suffer the consequences.
Leaders can bring about great revolution. They can either be the tools that usher humanity into a better era, like Martin Luther King, or those who bring about generations of suffering and inflict terrible pain, like Adolf Hitler. Since they hold immense power, I believe that the most important quality of an effective leader is having a sound moral character.
A good leader is one who creates a good example. He must always strive to do the right thing, because only then will the organization be morally sound. For any company to build the trust of their customers, it is essential that they follow business practices that are fair and do not adversely affect society. If the leader himself does not live up to that standard, it is unlikely that his peers will. This will eventually lead to the organization crumbling as a result of their duplicitous business practices.
Furthermore, having a sound moral character is infinitely more important than being able to command the respect of your peers. Everyone in your team may respect you, but unless you have a morally sound goal, your efforts will be in vain. In fact, they may cause more destruction and lead to society actually being worse off! Consider the example of Adolf Hitler - many will argue that he was a brilliant commander, and almost everyone will agree he had the respect of his peers. However, he led to the execution of hundreds of thousands of Jews, and his massacres are still considered to be one of the worst crises humanity ever had to suffer, hundreds of years later.
It is true that a leader will only be able to keep his peers motivated if they feel a sense of unity, and towards that end, they need to be able to respect their leader. If they don't respect their leader, they might always have a residual feeling that they could have done the job better. Although this might reduce productivity, they are better off this way rather than having a leader that has negative and malicious intent.
Therefore, it is extremely crucial for a leader to be of sound moral judgement, even more so than his ability to maintain the respect of his peers. If not, disastrous results may ensue, and entire generations may have to suffer the consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 609, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crises'' or 'cris's', 'crise's', 'crisis's'?
Suggestion: crises'; cris's; crise's; crisis's
...still considered to be one of the worst crises humanity ever had to suffer, hundreds o...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e able to respect their leader. If they dont respect their leader, they might always...
^^^^
Line 27, column 609, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crises'' or 'cris's', 'crise's', 'crisis's'?
Suggestion: crises'; cris's; crise's; crisis's
...still considered to be one of the worst crises humanity ever had to suffer, hundreds o...
^^^^^^
Line 31, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e able to respect their leader. If they dont respect their leader, they might always...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, in fact, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.5258426966 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 36.0 12.4196629213 290% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 100.0 33.0505617978 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3712.0 2235.4752809 166% => OK
No of words: 772.0 442.535393258 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80829015544 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.27113725669 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50217807356 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.268134715026 0.4932671777 54% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1148.4 704.065955056 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 28.0 6.24550561798 448% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8285610448 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.176470588 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.97078651685 201% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259284754385 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888289553815 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895656930254 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146231447881 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443760624612 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.4 8.38706741573 76% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.