In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is undeniable that progress in most fields is based in previous achievements, that lead to knowledge which may be the base for new developments. For example, without the invention of electrical systems, the invention of computers would have been implausible. As well as this, modern physics, although absolutely different, has its roots in Newton theories to establish physical models of reality. These two examples support my opinion on this statement, as I am convinced that it is veritable.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, errors and failures are the principal motor of any kind of development, from technological to sportive. Bill Gates, in his early working years, as lots of tyros that starts in a business, was fired from his first job. However, he managed to continue trying to make his dreams true, and this failure in his life led to a better understanding of what industry demanded, and a better focus of his effort. This example can be applied to the case of flaws committed by other people, as they can serve as a model of what should not be done for future researchers. In this sense, it is clear that past experience helps future inventions.
To support the aforementioned opinion, I would also like to highlight that there are many fields of knowledge in which this statement holds true. As physics would not have advanced without research made by Newton, Laplace, and many other investigators, medicine would not be as developed as it is now if it were not for the invention of many medicaments, such as penicillin. Usain Bolt’s world record run would have been much slower if there had not been investigators that polished the running technique and established the most efficient way of training. Regarding education, actual methodologies used to teach children are much more effective than those used before a thorough sociological study about them was taken.
However, it should also be mentioned that there are people who, without a solid theoretical base in their field of knowledge, are able to contribute with their investigation, and make significant contributions. An example of this is Albert Einstein, the worldwide-famous scientist that developed the relativity theory. His works supposed a revolution in physics, as they helped to state that a new paradigm needed to be defined in order to attain a better modelling of physical events. Nevertheless, this kind of cases is, far from common, extremely rare. Thus, taking into account the tiny probability of succeeding in a field of endeavor without previous knowledge, it is not harebrained to vindicate the impossibility of doing that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 79
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limi 83
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base bec 62
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station."To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population gro 69
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enoug 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...I am convinced that it is veritable. Further emphasizing on my point of view, errors...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...rchers. In this sense, it is clear that past experience helps future inventions. To support ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13689095128 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04959075423 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573085846868 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0287371674 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148811350428 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421210476957 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500422423933 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867636329341 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374409781884 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.