Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A true leader is one who keeps his subjects first and then himself. Any leader, who is totally focused on betterment of his group, irrespective of how much he is influenced by his peers will always have loyalty. The prompt says that a whimsical leader, who is easily manipulated achieves very little. In my opinion, I agree with the prompt for three reasons.
To begin with, an important quality to be possessed by a leader is being firm and martinet. A particular roadmap, envisioned by a leader must be consistently backed by him and his peers. If the leader showcases diffidence, then there won't be any progress made towards his subjects. Take the example of demonetization carried out in India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi carried out demonetization wherein all the existing 500 and 1000 rupee currency notes were deemed invalid with immediate effect. This was a masterstroke with respect to narrowing down the black money holders.There were many oppositions for the demonetization considering the impact it had on the rural public. But the economic impact it had by recovering crores of black money, it was a success. Had there been a gullible leader who caved in for the opposition, then India wouldn't have had such an economic uplift. The above example illustrates how probity and being firm are necessary for a leader.
Further, a leader known to be easily influenced will no longer stay in power, manipulated and will be snubbed very at the earliest. To illustrate, a manager in multi national company who heads the marketing division, has to select a particular location for the upcoming product launch. The manager decides on a location, but knowing his gullible nature, his peers recommend him to change the location at the last moment citing few vague reasons which the manager readily accepts. This results in the failure of the event as the manager is not able to replicate the preparation at the other location. A strong leader, who's not easily manipulated would've stood his guard and backed his instincts to go with the existing set up. The example illustrates how a gullible leader is manipulated and discarded.
To add further, a leader is respected for his principles, not for the ideas or principles of his peers. A leader should maintain his solidarity even after reaching greater heights and not being gullible. To give an example, Elon Musk is strong minded leader who heads multiple companies across different domains. He has brought in lot of investment mainly due to his vision.
Investors trust him with their capital because of the kind of leadership he portrays and his roadmap. If he changes his course, or alters his roadmap at every single opinion, then there wouldn't be a sustainable roadmap good enough to impress the investors.
The example illustrates, how unpopular opinions are discarded and a solid roadmap is maintained by a strong leader than one who is gullible.
Leadership is strong art based on principles and firm determination. One should stay by his opinions and vision to be successful in achieving whatever they have set out for. Being easily influenced is a mark of a weak leader who will be snubbed at the first signs of gullibility.
- The settlements of New Mexico s Chaco Canyon in American Southwest were notable for their massive stone buildings known as great houses containing hundreds of rooms and standing three or four stories high since the twelfth century A D Archeologists have b 65
- QUESTION Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 76
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 58
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... narrowing down the black money holders.There were many oppositions for the demonetiz...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 842, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...caved in for the opposition, then India wouldnt have had such an economic uplift. The a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 618, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...at the other location. A strong leader, whos not easily manipulated wouldve stood hi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: would've
...ong leader, whos not easily manipulated wouldve stood his guard and backed his instinct...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...map at every single opinion, then there wouldnt be a sustainable roadmap good enough to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, as to, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2668.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99625468165 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83077444472 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501872659176 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4643060494 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.0 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4137931034 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154829609605 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474648053297 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335616020819 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867284026709 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403109753897 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.