In any profession-business, politics, education, government- those on power should step down after five years.
To operate a group from a school club to a whole city, just need a leader, handle the most power, to operate everything, and make every decision. But a leader has power too long might happen some trouble and disaster so in my opinion- a professional who is in very huge power should change every five years.
Some skepticism argued that a huge product such as the BOT or enact a law, it must need several years to achieve. If the profession is replaced during the program, the program might not ongoing smoothly and it might be abolished that all citizens will bear the burned because the product uses their taxing money. Also, the education profession tries to enact some policy to let students have a better study environment but might be blocked by the profession changed. If the profession dislikes the former educator and abolishes every policy, the former profession enacts, the whole education process will be stopped and stagnation.
However, the above assumption will not easily happen since the profession will be recommended or elected that the most policy would be continuing to operate and being well unless the program has some risk or problem that the profession will change it. Therefore, the profession holds power too long might covet and greedy. If the leader holds the power to corrupt citizens’ money and makes a lot of wrong decisions that would make the whole city deep in crisis. So the rotation would avoid the situation happened and the new profession can abolish the wrong and problem program also enact a serious beneficial issue to benefit everyone.
Nevertheless, most humans are selfish and greedy. If the profession would be replaced every five years, it might intimidate the profession to face their work seriously because they know they would be replaced at any time. In Taiwan, whether the president, mayor or the principle all need to change after four years to make sure the whole group can operate smoothly. Even the president only reigns for eight years, after eight years the president must step down. On the other side, china's president has been reign for a long time, and nowadays China is in chaos and messy. Nowadays society is a democratic society that every profession should step down after five years and rotated it.
In conclusion, the risk of non-alternation has outweighed the rotation, thus, the professions-business, politics, education, government- must step down after five years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 16 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | Isolus | 66 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities 58
- The argument predict that the business of the heating oil retailing must enhance via declining temperature and the growing population However to make the claim more convincing several assumption need supports and bolster 54
- The author states that a concentrated solution of UltraClean has greater solutions to kill bacteria However to make the claim more convincing the author needs to support several assumptions also strengthen the proposal 50
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage In the United States medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms How 73
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01477832512 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66522494535 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495073891626 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9433141191 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.764705882 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8823529412 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275009753393 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892200811052 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807177603715 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158170790432 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682369403486 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.