In any profession - business, politics, education, government - those in power should step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
As the human civilization developes, there are always debates about the change of leadership, some argued about the time in power, and some argued about the way to give the power seat to the next one. And there are people seeing that those in power should step down after five years, regardless of any profession. And I mostly agree with the view in the following three reasons.
To begin, setting a time limit for everyone in power is a reasonable approach to keep the blood fresh. Everytime a new leader comes onto the stage, the strategy of the firm or the nation will go through a change, large or small, and thus the whole community will never stick to the old tradition and thus innovation would be likely to happen. Take the united nation for example, the leader of UN is actually everchanging, and the five countries’ candidate take the leadership in turns. This actually helps to average the power and gives change to the conference in the UN, thus more innovative proposal would be able to raise, and the world would likely to be better.
However, it should be acknowledged that in some professions, the longer those in power stay, the more experienced and skillful they will be, and thus the better they can manage the bigger picture. The world do not lack examples of long-time leader. For example, In China there is a world-famous technology company called Huawei, and its leader Ren Zhengfei, in our concept, is quite a old man. Considering his age, people may doubt whether he could take a breast the frontier of technology, and as it turn out, he actually did. Under his command, Huawei became the well-known global 5G provider and in Huawei’s telephone department, the engineers managed to design their own silicon chips. Ren’s ideas are so advance and he foresee that Chinese technology companies should have their own technology to stand on their own feet, so that they could resist those economic sanctions. So when the man in power stays long enough, he will actually form unique view that can greatly contribute to the whole team.
To define whether to give the one in power a limited time is actually complicated. It should never be a simple five years, and it should also never be no limit. To determine how long a president, a CEO, a leader can keep his title, this requires a sophisticated evaluation plan and also a good preparation of the next candidate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-13 | Skittle_Mix07 | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-12 | Siam | 66 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | Sunita086 | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | bomavo | 83 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 58
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 83
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 58
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing an 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Ren Zhengfei, in our concept, is quite a old man. Considering his age, people ma...
^
Line 5, column 725, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'foresees'.
Suggestion: foresees
...hips. Ren’s ideas are so advance and he foresee that Chinese technology companies shoul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, may, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78313253012 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6067277874 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7709220867 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.764705882 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4117647059 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120626083102 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433824942229 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585498865394 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082619484336 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435821711424 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.