the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things
Stating that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things, this view asserts that routine environment can inspire us. In some senses, it is true that we can get more or greater achievement when we observe familiar things. In my point of view, however, considering that many cases which are revealed in science history and my personal experience, We don't have find only familiar or common or quotidian things or places.
Of course, many people would agree that routine things can be helpful to conceive good ideas. Considering that many historical cases which shows that many great people made solutions for hard problem, we don't have to seek eccentric phenomenon. For example, in Ancient Greek, a philosopher was in agony to know how to measure composition of a crown by not harming it. During his bath time, he suddenly realized that the way to measure composition of it by seeing the water spilled over. This example shows that phenomenon which are not special can also give a person good inspiration.
However, can we say always say that unfamiliarity is not useful to make great ideas? My answer is no. Considering that many scientific achievement which came from unpredictable and unique cases, our ability to make great ideas can be maximized. For example, a scientist saw that a kind of blue fungi killed other germs. It was very uncommon observation which have not been known until at that time. However, he make hypothesis which says that the a chemical which the blue fungi make is effective to kill germs. And he proved it and discovered first antibiotic in the human history. This shows that not overlooking uncommon cases can give chance to make great achievements
Moreover, when it comes to that we are in unfamiliar environment, we can refresh our minds and raise our productivity.
In my personal experience, I was high school student, I used to study in local library. However, the more familiar with the place, more lazy I was and less study hard. But, I changed my studying place from library to cafe, the time when I can focus on studying became longer and ability to complete my study plain raised. This shows that removing familiarity from one's work place can be helpful to improve exhausting mind.
To summarize, few people don't agree that our ability can be efficient when we are in common place or when we are seeing common things. However considering that the importance of closely looking unfamiliar things in making new discoveries in science history and refreshing our mind by entering into new environment, only foolish people would claims that necessary and sufficient conditions of best ideas is familiarity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | Zahid6400 | 54 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | gayatri5323 | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Murad1234 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 50
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 79
- Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller-skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment. Within that group of people, 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots had not been we 75
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 66
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... history and my personal experience, We dont have find only familiar or common or qu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...nd my personal experience, We dont have find only familiar or common or quotidian th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ple made solutions for hard problem, we dont have to seek eccentric phenomenon. For ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...n known until at that time. However, he make hypothesis which says that the a chemic...
^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ver, he make hypothesis which says that the a chemical which the blue fungi make is e...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 26, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ting mind. To summarize, few people dont agree that our ability can be efficient...
^^^^
Line 10, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ce or when we are seeing common things. However considering that the importance of clos...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 342, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'claim'
Suggestion: claim
... environment, only foolish people would claims that necessary and sufficient condition...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 390, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...hat necessary and sufficient conditions of best ideas is familiarity.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, kind of, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 32.0 11.3162921348 283% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98214285714 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70684114767 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497767857143 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1858804855 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137393269948 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399127978229 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952816880991 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709905100061 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817062162712 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.