The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
A leader is one who doesn't lead from the front, but rather takes his people along with him every step of the way. This can occur only when the leader is open to feedbacks and criticisms from his team. It is rightly said, that a leader is the best one if he or she can take in criticisms and apply them to produce the favourable solution.
A leader by definition is one who leads the pack. And he is chosen because he holds the necessary leadership qualities that can help coalesce the team's efforts to fruition in the most efficient manner. Thus, he must lead the team by example through his own manners and conduct. Any activity is best accomplished by a team if everyone works cohesively, i.e., team work is essential. For this to be effective, all the team members must learn to be open to feedback from their peers and take it positively in their stride. The leader, himself must set an example to his or her team to be open to ideas and feedback , irrespective of the person or his designation. This behaviour in turn brews a strong sense of team work and helpfulness among the team members.
A leader who encourages feedback from the people he or she leads also displays a sense of humility which is an essential characteristic of a leader. Many times, various leaders have displayed arrogance that comes with the power and responsibility of the office that they hold. However, this has mostly lead to their downfall. They were leaders who dictated the public but were never loved and respected and rather feared by their subordinates. Take the example of Hitler and Gandhi, the former was a feared dictator whom people loathe until today while the latter is the prime example of the prompt stated - one who lead the masses by listening to them and walking along with them.
There is no doubt that leadership is at its best when one is open to feedback from his or her people as it helps move the organisation forward in the right path.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 58
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 50
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 66
- The argument to be analyzed is as follows The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended S 53
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
A leader is one who doesnt lead from the front, but rather takes h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er team to be open to ideas and feedback , irrespective of the person or his desig...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...hat they hold. However, this has mostly lead to their downfall. They were leaders wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58739255014 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52028402364 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507163323782 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.025687113 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0625 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347673091352 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117070102829 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948334724176 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220068958895 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906819007944 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
A leader is one who doesnt lead from the front, but rather takes h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er team to be open to ideas and feedback , irrespective of the person or his desig...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...hat they hold. However, this has mostly lead to their downfall. They were leaders wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58739255014 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52028402364 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507163323782 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.025687113 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0625 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347673091352 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117070102829 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948334724176 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220068958895 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906819007944 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.