The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Leaders are mostly the ones who secure majority of votes from the people who elect their leaders. The best leaders are those who act according to the expectations of the people who elected them. The leaders who take feedback from the people whom they lead will be considered best.
One of the reason as to why to why the leaders are considered best when they take feedback from the people is they can know if they are meeting the people's expectations. When leaders take feedback from the people whom they lead they can get to know where they have to improve. When people give them negative feedback stating where they are not working properly, then the leaders can correct themselves and act accordingly. When the leaders get positive feedback regarding something then they will get to know that they are working properly in that area and need not improve themselves much in that area compared to other areas. They can utilize the time for improving the areas in which are functioning properly to work on other areas.
One of the example cases where the leaders receive feedback from the people whom they lead is where president of the country takes feedback from their country's people. The president of a country can take feedback from the people regarding the functioning of the government. He will get positive feedback on the areas where it is functioning properly meeting the people's expectations. He will get negative feedback on the areas where they lack. He will get to know which schemes are to be implemented for the welfare of their country. The president can then discuss the feedback with the government and implement the needed schemes for the welfare of their people.
The best leaders can be those who review themselves and analyze their strengths and weaknesses. But in the case where leaders take feedback from the people whom they lead, they can even get to know where they lack and where they need to improve themselves. Feedback from the people can reveal the aspects which might not have been known if the leaders considered other ways to know where they have to improve themselves and the areas in which they lack.
Feedback is essential for the leaders from the people whom they lead to become the best leaders.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 67
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 50
- When Stanley Park first opened it was the largest most heavily used public park in town It is still the largest park but it is no longer heavily used Video cameras mounted in the park s parking lots last month revealed the park s drop in popularity the re 70
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to why'.
Suggestion: to why
...onsidered best. One of the reason as to why to why the leaders are considered best when th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y are meeting the peoples expectations. When leaders take feedback from the people w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...correct themselves and act accordingly. When the leaders get positive feedback regar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... feedback on the areas where they lack. He will get to know which schemes are to b...
^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eed to improve themselves. Feedback from the people can reveal the aspects which ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, regarding, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 32.0 11.3162921348 283% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83896103896 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3753044385 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 215.323595506 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.316883116883 0.4932671777 64% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9005321911 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531623286978 0.243740707755 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242361115146 0.0831039109588 292% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166205660172 0.0758088955206 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.42973024221 0.150359130593 286% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125124479542 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to why'.
Suggestion: to why
...onsidered best. One of the reason as to why to why the leaders are considered best when th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y are meeting the peoples expectations. When leaders take feedback from the people w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...correct themselves and act accordingly. When the leaders get positive feedback regar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... feedback on the areas where they lack. He will get to know which schemes are to b...
^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eed to improve themselves. Feedback from the people can reveal the aspects which ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, regarding, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 32.0 11.3162921348 283% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83896103896 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3753044385 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 215.323595506 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.316883116883 0.4932671777 64% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9005321911 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531623286978 0.243740707755 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242361115146 0.0831039109588 292% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166205660172 0.0758088955206 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.42973024221 0.150359130593 286% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125124479542 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.