The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
For a society, to fully prepare the young for a better governance and leadership in any field, is to instil them an implicit sense of cooperation rather than competition.
I strongly agree to the author's view point because in multitude of ways such a societal setup has enduring results that are not only fruitful to the society but to the entire populace that is implicated on the one. No matter how healthy and prolific can the competitive environment be, there always exists a sense of malfeasance and detrimental thoughts among the competitiors which form the integral part of the process. Such a scenario is unyielding and is friviolous in many ways. For example, in the city of Vijayawada, India, annualy there happens a general election for the post of college head boy. Everytime and every moment, unless there is some untoward incident between the rivalry gangs, the campaign and the process is incomplete. Such incident reveals that the whole purpose is defeated by the unforthcoming situations.
To contrast, conider a recent example of youth election campaign at Bhatkal constituency in the state of Karnataka. Two major parties contested for a seat and the two contending candidates were young and budding representatives of the respective sides. No jeers, no cacophonies and no boistorous elements in the enire process at all. Everything was genteel and smooth and a wave of tacit cooperation always existed between the representatives. Post results, the leader so elected turned to out to be so yielding that, many of the developmental works were listed among famous world records. Since a great sense of cooperative attitude existed, the oppositition, without any calumny and castigation, kept a check on elected leader which was a way new approach that successfully turned out to be the best.
However, at times, extreme levels of cooperation and mutual understanding between the opposite, may lead to venality as there may come situations where, appropriate checks are actually void of the situation when it could be atmost necessary. Healthy competion among the antonymns is a necessity to a level.
In a way, the author is correct and I tend to agree for the fact that the best and yielding way for a society to prepare its tomorrow's citizens for leadership in goverment, industry, or in other fileds is by instilling and exhorting them to a sense of coopeation, but not competition.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 66
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 50
- "To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into major supermarkets, where it hopes word-of-mouth advertising will sustain sales 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12151898734 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02048764568 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567088607595 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1151308195 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.4375 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257441247853 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661364081274 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112095069384 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170190297608 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149219018714 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.