The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The widespread environmental pollution has been a burning issue in the world at the moment, the major contributor of which are the consumer based household waste products, which are often misplaced an mismanaged. It has been debated that limiting the consumer-generated waste for each household in towns and cities would be a good alternative to ameliorate the envirnomental problems. While I agree with the fact that imposing such stringent rules would bring some changes in the behaviorial pattern of people, I beileve that this solution has more negative ramifications as compared to its benefits. Such views are further explored in the impending paragraphs.
Studying human behaviour, it can be easily understood that when limitations are applied to something, people are often attracted towards breaking such constrains. This can easily be examplified by the increase in demand of "Kinderjoy-eggs", a chocolate confection, deemed as a chocking hazard by the United States in 2000 AD, right after their ban. This shows that, whenever people are asked not to do someting by the government, their want to flout such restriction is often exhilerated, which would be the case imposed in the amount of waste to be produced by each household. As the government impose the limits strictly, the people are led to dispose their excess waste in haphazardly, leading to further intensification of the issue of environmental pollution.
Moreover, imposing limitations on exactly same amount of waste to be generated from a household would not be a proper measure applicaple to all, as the wastes generated by diferent families and their amount varies sporadically, as per the family's consumer pattern. Such that, implying that the same amount of waste is to be produced by the family, would work for families who rely less on packaged goods and materials, but would be a huge problem for the ones with the general amount of waste generated is greated than an average househiold, which is a deemed by the government. In such conditions, rather that being motivated to change or limit their waste production, they would be motivated the dump their "excess-waste" in places like rivers or sidewalks, which would do no good to the current environmental issues.
In the meantime, the solution of limiting waste production is not all bad, as if it can be imposed alongside proper awareness programs to educate the people about their carbon footprint, then this can make a serious impact to assuage the dire environmental problems. But, the government must be lenient to the general public and make them understand the issue in-hand leading to the rules being imposed, rather than imposing a stringent rule without any consideration to the public awareness.
As envirnomental issues are often mitigated by a change in the human behaviorial pattern, which could only be done by raising awareness among the people about their impact and well as the roles they can play in order to solve such issues. But imposing strict limits, rules and fines without any consideration to the people's understanding would only lead to people acting out and flouting such rules without proper care about the repercussions of such activities. Thus, I beileve such rules and limits would only work if paired with proper edifying efforts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- Prevention is better than cure Research and Treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in a preventive measure To what extent do you agree 80
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Many people in poor countries die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication required Do you believe that drug companies should make their products available at reduced prices in these countries 80
- The knowledge of maths is not important for most jobs nowadays To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The charts below show the various languages spoken by people living in Canada in the years 2000 and 2021 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ste products, which are often misplaced an mismanaged. It has been debated that li...
^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...ate the envirnomental problems. While I agree with the fact that imposing such stringent rules would bri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the ones with the general amount of waste generated is greated than an avera...
^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d than an average househiold, which is a deemed by the government. In such condit...
^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
..., the government must be lenient to the general public and make them understand the issue in-h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2799.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24157303371 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1809027571 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47191011236 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 876.6 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6542463562 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.9375 118.986275619 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.375 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205521334769 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791766555177 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663129173043 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125143407624 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676665993758 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 14.1392134831 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.