The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Environmental problems engendered by consumer-generated waste impinge huge detriments in this day and age; therefore, debates to decide what is the best way to resolve the problem is emerging. Here, the author contends that the optimal means to solve the issue is for towns and cities to set strict limits on the amount of waste from each household. While this argument sounds axiomatic to some extent, there are some flaws to the claim.
To begin with, there is a high possibility that the given plan will fail. It might work only theoretically, but it seems rather dubious in reality since there are so many loopholes to this plan, thereby enabling citizens to cheat easily. It is foreseeable that people will bring the trash out of their household and dispose their trash in other places if strict limit is set. There is no plan mentioned to watch every household to prevent them from cheating, and it is simply impossible to do so. If so, the new policy will not result in reducing the total amount of trash, which also results in failing to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated trash. Also, citizens might dispose their trash on streets and public spaces, which will yield more problems.
Second, the stated solution can hardly be the best one since it might become more vice than virtue. A lot of decisions have to made, which includes the exact limit of the trash, the extent of time period of disposal, and whom to monitor the program. There is no definite criterion on which the decision can rely on; also, cities have to hire more employees to monitor and manage the new program which will ask citizens to pay more taxes. In this case, environmental problems mediated by consumer-generated waste might be solved, but new problems will occur which in turn defeats the purpose. It might be better to come up with a solution that has higher possibility of automation.
Lastly, such restrictions will impact people differently depending on their social economic status. More opulent people will have more access to products that are technologically devised to generate less waste. Moreover, more affluent people are able to eat out more, hire trash service, and go on a vacation to limit their household trash, which implies discrimination and unfairness of the program. Therefore, the suggested policy cannot be taken as the best soluton to environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste.
All in all, among all those ways to handle the problem of ever increasing amount of consumer-generated waste, the suggested solution is not the best one because of aforementioned reasons. There is a dire need to seek for the new optimal solution to the issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 81
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal systemReason: Laws cannot change what is in people’s hearts or minds. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the re 55
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 72
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 78
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse i 89
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Therefore, the suggested policy cannot be taken as the best soluton to environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste.
Error: soluton Suggestion: solution
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 448 350
No. of Characters: 2189 1500
No. of Different Words: 222 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.601 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.886 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.863 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.568 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.075 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t has higher possibility of automation. Lastly, such restrictions will impact pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02901785714 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91048746788 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511160714286 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8759012437 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.65 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351245930169 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990303485735 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819674573228 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190395731018 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604891724538 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.