The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones.

The process of teaching and learning is ubiquitous in everyone's life. Different people have different ways of learning prudently. During the process of teaching-learning, in some cases we didactically teach things very easily and learners acquire it instantly, however, in some cases, we often encounter peccadillos. As per the prompt above, the best way to teach is just to praise the positive actions and ignore the negative ones. I strongly disagree with the latter part of the prompt above. The negative ones can entrench more deeply into our mind if it is taken into consideration rather than ignoring it.
To begin with, humans pose the capability to learn more from a mistake and negative actions rather than from positive action, that is praised. The negative actions, that are caused due to some weakness, if ignored may lead to the same consequences forever. If they are taken into consideration, the negative ones may turn into positive ones after a while. For instance, if a teacher, discussing the questions on the exam last semester, neglect the questions that are attempted badly by most of the students, then there will be a very low probability that the students will attempt with confidence the same question if they encounter it next time.
In addition to that, a person seeking perfection in his career must focus on his strong as well as weak point to necessarily place him in ascending position. If he is competent in skill and knowledge but lacks morality and ethics, the person might not be successful in his future endeavors. For instance, a surgeon, who is proficient in his skill but has a habit of negligence may lead to bad consequences. The surgeon must be careful and thoughtful about his negligence and correct the habit. If he doesn’t eliminate his negligence he will be consequentially hampered and his proficiency will be demeaned.
Furthermore, Negative Actions might lead to devastating consequences rather than praise for positive actions. A simple negative action is much riskier than a huge positive action. For example, the role of the defender is very crucial in football, a single small mistake can lead to loss even if he saved the team 100 times from conceding a goal. If the defender doesn’t learn from the earlier mistake, then the team a concede another loss even if the team is heavily strong.
So, by far, the best way to teach is to praise positive actions, which invigorate the learners, whereas, considering a negative action is also commensurately important. Praising positive actions and recanting from negative actions will lead to efficacious teaching.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-02 MMoksha 66 view
2024-06-30 sefeliz 66 view
2024-06-30 AkellaSrinivas 66 view
2024-04-17 guozhishan 50 view
2024-03-03 Zahid6400 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ShirishBasnet1 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...from the earlier mistake, then the team a concede another loss even if the team is heavil...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, in some cases, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0788863109 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89838084773 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512761020882 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8762671373 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.238095238 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402449190076 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124287807268 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157288834708 0.0758088955206 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245252590436 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167065616611 0.0667264976115 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.