The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The best way to teach is to inspire the students to try out new things and to build up their character that is dauntless, they do not fear failure. This gives them a really strong advantage and can easily outline students’ interests and disinterests. It all begins with the teacher, having been a student himself, it should dawn upon him the peculiarities of his predecessor so he/she can improve upon it and not commit the same mistakes.
A teacher that is supportive, enthusiastic and palatable will reflect his personality onto his pupils. This will not only encourage the students but unknowingly the master has begun to pave the way for future successes. In return, the student will come to respect what his mentor has done for him over the years and come to revere him. This would not be an immediate effect as young students tend to misinterpret their teacher’s supportiveness as pompous and intrusive, but as a growing adult comes to slowly realize the importance of his parents' support and sacrifice, so will the teacher become an integral part of his family.
This doesn’t mean that a mentor can favorite out the best among their pupils, it denigrates the character of the mentor and discourages the left out students. Not all students are at an equal intellectual and emotional capacity, each student has to be approached in a different way and the teacher that puts in this extra effort becomes part of the elite few. Having experienced this first hand, the various teachers at my school would seldom reach out to their students and truly impact their lives. Most of us would form our own groups to support each other. The few who were left out would fall into two categories- the autodidacts and the recidivists.
It is the duty of the mentor to correct a student’s faults so it is not repeated again, but in a way that doesn’t discourage them to keep trying. Extreme strictness against a child would provoke them to effacement from which it would be difficult to reach them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...supportiveness as pompous and intrusive, but as a growing adult comes to slowly r...
^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...city, each student has to be approached in a different way and the teacher that puts in this extra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeated'.
Suggestion: repeated
...ct a student's faults so it is not repeated again, but in a way that doesn't discour...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h it would be difficult to reach them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87536231884 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83196564343 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544927536232 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.384431199 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0516273249324 0.243740707755 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0213211144614 0.0831039109588 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367474346728 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0357462444115 0.150359130593 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203889637572 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.