The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Our life is a journey that takes turns as and when we make choices. These choices will if not immediately, takes time to reflect the consequences, either good or bad as per our own decisions. Our character is built by our ability to differentiate between the positive and the negative while making a wiser choice that can impact us and the people around us and also by some of the external factors like family, peers, society etc. that renders some of the qualities into us. The best way these factors can affect our positive character is by praising our positive actions than the negative ones while not completely ignoring our negative actions but by curbing to learn from them.
While when we were kids, the school, teachers and our parents played important role in shaping our character and behavior. For instance, the teachers kept praising us before an entire class when we got good grades, or performed well in any cultural activities such as playing a musical instrument, staging a play etc. which not only motivated us to perform better but also pushed others to have a hobby and interest, and also to follow such activities. When a subject teacher praised us for getting good grades, it also kept others intact to perform well and receive praise for themselves too. This action although seem very normal, but at that age it acts a force that can change several actions leading to good and productive results in us all. Hence, praising the positive actions leads to better overall development.
Also, our parents are equally responsible for our social behavior and characteristics. In certain circumstance, let’s say, a person doesn’t value deeds of others and also keeps disregarding the work that doesn’t quite match his/her work. This displays a sense of condemnation and selfish acts. Perhaps, he might also disrespect elders etc. which are certain qualities that are nurtured from our childhood. If his/her parents explained him the importance of treating elders with respect, perhaps they praised his actions whenever he did, the kid would assume that to be something to take pride of and follow that action. And his behavioral aspects would have been reversed.
However, ignoring negative actions doesn’t always hold good because of many circumstances that follows it. For instance, ignoring negative actions for a long time might lead to overpowering of certain traits which would become extremely difficult to change. They can even lead an individual to commit antisocial works, like embezzling or robbing people etc. which might have initially followed by stealing from their parents or relatives, which when found out was ignored and not punished. This leads to serious behavioral structure that made him/her to commit more like it. If their parents or relatives had punished and made him/her understand the situation, it would have brought about serious changes by leading them to the opposite shore of thoughts.
While praising positive actions are very much important for an overall development of an individual, it is also necessary to not ignore but help them learn from what might happen to them with their negative actions. Therefore, as discussed in the previous paragraphs regarding the aspects affecting out behavior and character, in summary, praising good actions brings up motivation and interest to keep doing good things while keeping check with the aspects affecting their character with the negative actions without ignoring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supp 66
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 83
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants powerful anti aging and immune system boosting compounds Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day the greater the benefits Green tea however contains moder 53
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 66
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 54
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...us and the people around us and also by some of the external factors like family, peers, so...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 445, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...amily, peers, society etc. that renders some of the qualities into us. The best way these f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 33.0505617978 206% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2922.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19005328597 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62956639215 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50621669627 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7515152854 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6538461538 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19302059665 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526473902146 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556353035756 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111999996049 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275873082595 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...us and the people around us and also by some of the external factors like family, peers, so...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 445, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...amily, peers, society etc. that renders some of the qualities into us. The best way these f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 33.0505617978 206% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2922.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19005328597 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62956639215 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50621669627 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7515152854 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6538461538 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19302059665 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526473902146 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556353035756 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111999996049 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275873082595 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.