The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I am quite consonant with the first half of the given topic but absolutely can’t agree with the second half. Praising someone for positive actions is great, but do you think ignoring the negative actions will not impact the person’s future?
Ignorance of negative actions does not help mitigate the negative mentality in the person. That person, who is used to negative actions, won’t be able to stop themselves when committing the same mistakes in the future. Blind ignorance will accumulate and will ultimately have a giant but irreversible impact that is going to change the course of the person’s life. People often say ignorance is bliss, but in this case, it’s not.
I embrace the idea of praising positive actions; However, the person should have self-control and not get full of himself too easily and start acting smug just because of some positive things he accomplished.
I have seen parents who ignored the negative actions of their children, and they repented their decisions in the future. The parents, quite ambiguous about the child’s actions, never confronted him as they were thinking about the insignificance of the things he stole rather than the root of the problem: theft. The moment he was arrested later is still vivid in my memories: stealing and being involved in deep conspiracies.
In conclusion, my idea of agreeing to the first part and being disconsonant to the second part will not quite easily be changed as it is also in line with some experiences in my life: I insist on praising the positive actions, criticising and correcting the negative ones while teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 267.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05243445693 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69271459517 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4566304889 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.636363636 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18465630954 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699798913865 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07512540281 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106285389313 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711568489957 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.