The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree
with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in
which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and
explain how these examples shape your position.
People should be shown the glory that is achievable, courtesy of positive actions. This will fill them with positivity and the desire to do positive things, so that outcomes are in their favour. However, not all people recieve the desired outcomes and some face such tough situations, that they change themselves drastically. To avoid them into taking any wayward steps in their lives, people should also be taught the consequences of negative actions. For instance, Mahabharata aims to teach people not only the good fortune associated with positivity like that of Pandavas, who eventually were crowned as emperors, but also the undeserving circumstances faced by Karna, which led him into following bad influences who not only corrupted his morals, but were also responsible for his death.
Some people suggest that it would be wise that people are taught only positive things. They argue that if they aren’t taught negative things, then they would not come to know about them and hence not follow them in any phase of their life. Teaching negative things might arouse curiosity in students which might entangle them with bad name.
However, these people should understand that corrupt behaviour in humans is like spicy taste in chillis. No matter what procedure one might adopt to produce chillis, it does not lose its inherent spicy taste. However, one add sugar in their meal to make the spicy taste less dominant. Similarly, human nature inherently has deviousness associated which is inseparable. However, by teaching people the bad outcomes of negative actions, the treacherous behaviour might take a side and altruistic behaviour might reflect in the person. The above opposing argument is completely invalid since the first people were also naive, did not know any negative things. Still some of them adhered to the wrong path like Karna, which led to their ill fate.
Schools are a perfect example where students are not only taught about the rewards of positive actions, but also the harsh consequences of negative actions. Students are taught stories of Mahatma Gandhi, Jhansi ki Rani who fought till their last breathe for the freedom of India in their own righteous ways. Their struggle for freedom fomented up a revolution among people to move against the oppressive British rules. Despite their positive ambitions, they faced a lot of hinderance because of traitors who would lay out their plans to opposition, making their struggles even more harder. The end result of their struggle is evident in front of the world. Today, India is an independent nation, which was mainly possible because of the sacrifices of these brave people. Also, teachers condemned the actions of those who betrayed their nation and told that they enjoyed lavish life in the early phase, but were left struggling in their latter part of their life. This teaches the students, no matter how tough the road ahead is, one should stick to the right path. Wrong path might lead to initial happiness, but is filled with stones ahead in the path
In view of above examples and arguments, it is clear that people should be taught the brave stories associated with positive intent, but also the doom of people when they took the wrong path to instill a fear of committing wrong actions, coercing people to move on the right track.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- Claim The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Reason The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 58
- Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction companies Alpha and Zeta Although the two buildings had identical floor plans the building con 67
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...lis. No matter what procedure one might adopt to produce chillis, it does not lose its i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...aive, did not know any negative things. Still some of them adhered to the wrong path ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 464, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hinderance seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of hinderances'.
Suggestion: a lot of hinderances
...te their positive ambitions, they faced a lot of hinderance because of traitors who would lay out t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 577, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'harder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: harder
...opposition, making their struggles even more harder. The end result of their struggle is ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2774.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05282331512 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43395172949 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 847.8 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9091424689 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.583333333 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127609730419 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414893049751 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321256380208 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796531762898 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304436627399 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.