The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
What is the best way to educate a child? Is it by praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones or by ignoring positive actions and lauding negative ones? There are several ways to educate a child. One can teach a child by admonition, by taking a child out to experience outside life, and many other ways. Educating a child is not only done by extolling and ignoring both positive and negative actions. However, praising positive actions and ignoring negative actions are perilous because ignoring negative actions will have adverse effect on a child’s future.
Ignoring negative actions and commending positive ones seems absurd as the negative actions ignored will lead to such individual’s downfall later in life. For instance, a student in high school, running around the class may trip and ram into a desk, chair or another student, thereby injuring himself or herself and whosoever he or she rams into. Will it be wise enough for the pedagogue to wait until the child stop running due to tiredness before praising such child for stopping? Of course no.
In addition to this, in high school, some students attend classes with volatile equipment that could raze down the school building such as chemistry. As student attend these classes, they need close supervision and direction on their activities in the classes to make proper use of the equipment. For example, student in chemistry lab playing with acid and bases should not be ignored as these substances, if handled carelessly, may lit up the school building. In fact, if a teacher is caught ignoring students, the teacher should be laid off immediately.
Furthermore, as student leave the safe haven of their parent and school, they proceed into outside life by either getting employed or setting up their personal business. An individual whose negative actions are ignored from the onset will find it difficult to cope at place of work because employers will not overlook mistakes that could cost them their establishments, thereby laying such individual off in no time.
True, some might argue that praising positive actions lead to such child doing more of the positive acts. Some might even quibble further by saying a child whose negative actions ae being will learn to correct himself or herself in future. All these are true to some extent, but what if such child never get the opportunity learning to correct his mistakes before such mistake lands him or her in trouble? All in all, a child’s negative actions should never be overlooked.
In conclusion, ignoring negative actions and praising positive action is parlous to an individual’s life as such individual will encounter several problems later in life. Children whose positive actions are lauded and negative acts are overlooked becomes liability on the society in the long run. Thus, it is impolitic to overlook negative actions while praising positive actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to ad 50
- We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects Clearly opening the caf w 58
- Archaeologists have long thought that an artifact called the pemchint was used by Dodecan people solely as a musical instrument Pemchints consist of hollowed pieces of bone shell or wood that are tied together with long straps When whirled in the air the 73
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: SAFE_HAVEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'haven'.
Suggestion: haven
.... Furthermore, as student leave the safe haven of their parent and school, they procee...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ill learn to correct himself or herself in future. All these are true to some extent, but...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2445.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14736842105 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60070307988 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498947368421 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6290654061 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.304347826 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.652173913 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13043478261 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216376011906 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799123015118 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077569787771 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121333393551 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791590251139 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.