The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which
adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how
these examples shape your position.
Should politician have elusive ideals or common fround and conensus? By elusive ideals means having different perspective rather than similar mentality and propriety. While common perspective among politician is beneficial in taking decision which must be take immidiately, elusive ideal is neccesary for development and to protect citizen interest.
Politicians who have mutual agreement with another party with different views can results in corruption and autocratic government. World War II germany government is good illustration of this situation. During that time, Hitler was in consensus with all opposition party. Consequently, he assumed germany as his own property and decimated more than 10 millions of jewish. If he was censured by other politician, then may be WW II may not be happened.
Every system has flaws and leverages over other system. But that does not means every on has to agree with one thought. For instance, USA and Russia follows capitalism and communisim respectively and both system have own advantages and disadvantages. If politician do not have comunist mind set, private companies in capitalist country might exploit people in absence of public company because there is not place for public company in capitalist country as opposed to communist country.
On the other hand, sometimes nation emergency situation and security matters can aks for common consensus among politician. Consider, attack on Osama bin laden, if all USA politician did not agree puting personal right forward to attack, he may not havve killed.
In conclusion, politician must have different ideals instead of common ground. However, in dire emergency situation, everyone should stood for nation rather than personal moral.
- Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade health and education Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 67
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerat 33
- Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services Discuss both 78
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusiveideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with therecommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 million'.
Suggestion: 10 million
...is own property and decimated more than 10 millions of jewish. If he was censured by other pol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61509433962 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83914055959 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633962264151 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8967866037 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0439550723499 0.243740707755 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0138292333445 0.0831039109588 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230568728109 0.0758088955206 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0252243125792 0.150359130593 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175680579934 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.