Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action. Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing the action. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
Morality is the virtue of a person, it is an inherent quality that people possess. It is not something that cannot be judged on the basis of outcomes, the thought that goes behind it is what matters the most. So, we cannot assume an action to be done in good faith just because the good results outweigh the bad. Doing good is not something that can be quantized. We can never truly measure the amount of good that has resulted from an action, it is all a matter of perspective. So, one person might choose to focus on only the good part, and render the disadvantages negligent, while another person might consider the disadvantages resulting from the action to be too huge. We cannot be fully dispassionate when taking a side, one side will always appeal more to a person than the other side.Life is unpredictable and untractable, it changes in a matter of seconds. We cannot always depend on things to go our way, and that is exactly why depending on the results of an action is discouraged. So, a person with the best of intentions might take actions that lead to dire consequences, while a malevolent person might end up becoming the hero, even though that was not his true intention. Benevolency in a very important trait when it comes to assessing someone's morality. No matter how much the person is celebrated for his deeds, it always comes down to the intentions. In one way or another, the real intentions behind the action always come out. Take for example the case of renowned personality donating to a social cause related to feminism because of the publicity he will be getting through it. Even though it might look like he is doing good, but his intentions are not truly honest and moral. But, true intentions always have a way of showing up. So, the same person soem days later is in the news for being embroiled in a sex scandal. How does this portray his morality now? Something to be considered when making such statements. Therefore, we can conclude that when we are judging the morality of a certain action, the final outcome shouldn't be the only factor taken into consideration, the intentions of the person who is performing the action is equally, if not more important.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-04 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
2023-07-13 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
2022-09-12 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
2022-08-21 | headboy | 50 | view |
2022-06-07 | Jaichiddharth R K | 50 | view |
- claim The emergence of the online blogosphere and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics wil 66
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 58
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 50
- In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has been undeveloped for decades is a perfect site for this plant The build 66
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 794, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Life
...al more to a person than the other side.Life is unpredictable and untractable, it ch...
^^^^
Line 1, column 2047, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... of a certain action, the final outcome shouldnt be the only factor taken into considera...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65206185567 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67097242346 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510309278351 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4971501745 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94736842105 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292421202043 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895589497592 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968007003026 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292421202043 0.150359130593 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.