Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
To revitalize the institution, good leadership is needed; however, new election and new leader is not needed. I disagree with this statement: fixed time period is not appropriate for the field. If good person is at position, he can led further. Perhaps it takes whole life of that person. However, if impassive person is at high position, it should be rejected recently.
To begin with, to get a success to the field always honest and straightforward person is required. For instance, to lead the peace process one scrupulous person was demand by the country, at that situation handled by the Nepali congress party chief Girija prasad koirala. He becomes prime minister of Nepal continuously 20 years. He had success to solve the war (inter religion war between hindu and muslim). If there is restriction to conduct the government that contribution is not possible.
In addition, to develop the country, good rules and regulation is needed. To make a good customs candid person is needed. Some task are very complicated and it takes more time than five years. At this situation long term leadership is needed. Time period can not determine the capacity of the person. Human beings becomes perfect only after the struggled with the problem. If anyone faced the difficult and important task he will get the honor. In many situation, company also die with its manager: no-one able to handled that institution properly. I involved in one spiritual institution, that is handled by one Guru persistently from 13 years. If we change the chairperson, surely,institution reputation will obliterated.
Finally, to achieved the goal of any field,continuous insightful persons' leadership is needed. If he can not able to conduct nicely, it is better to reject that person directly; 5 years time is not suitable. Continuous discussion and caring is important to get achievement. Person is not a problem; policy is the major problem. We can get good result with changing with our attitude and performance.
To recapitulate, to get the good results of the any field, continuous discussion and decorum person is needed. Only changing the leader only creates the problems. It is just a loss of time; not a solution. Hence, it is better to give a proper time to led the field; particular restriction is fruitless.
- people choose same course of study 16
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 50
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wher 70
- The human mind is superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
.... If good person is at position, he can led further. Perhaps it takes whole life of...
^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... religion war between hindu and muslim. If there is restriction to conduct the gov...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'custom'?
Suggestion: custom
...nd regulation is needed. To make a good customs candid person is needed. Some task are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...toms candid person is needed. Some task are very complicated and it takes more time...
^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun situation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many situations'.
Suggestion: many situations
...mportant task he will get the honor. In many situation, company also die with its manager: no-...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , institution
...rs. If we change the chairperson, surely,institution reputation will obliterated. Finally, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'obliterate'
Suggestion: obliterate
...son, surely,institution reputation will obliterated. Finally, to achieved the goal of any ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , continuous
...nally, to achieved the goal of any field,continuous insightful persons leadership is needed...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...goal of any field,continuous insightful persons leadership is needed. If he can not abl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06332453826 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98427034534 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517150395778 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3728820735 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.1724137931 118.986275619 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0689655172 23.4991977007 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.89655172414 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111771226164 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286833362257 0.0831039109588 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369566595537 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678490124216 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169388179718 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 14.1392134831 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.18 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.