Claim: In any situation, the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments.
Reason: Facts are objective, so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals.
Persuading someone is not an easy task, we can’t change anyone’s mind, and we can’t force someone to agree with us upon facts. Somehow, somewhat they will knock head with us, or they’ll slightly equivocate on the fact to end the issue, but does it change their mind, do you persuade them? I’m sure you can’t because persuading is as difficult a task as a husband winning an argument over his wife…
In many situations we have seen people follow the tribes; in a room, if one person is right but the troop is not agreeing on the fact presented by the person, he/she cannot persuade the group! One person follows the footsteps of another and forms a multitude of people of like-minded members, end up disparaging the person with the facts.
Persuading our family members, friends, peers, or someone like-minded is much easier than persuading a group because we can claim our facts to them without any altercation, which may their minds. When it comes to changing our minds two things that stand out are: it's best done by someone we admire and appreciate and unity settings influence what we think.
We need a psychological safety net to change our mind, a safety that we’re not going to lose a friend, or we’re not going to be ceased from our society; we need to know the promotion of mind not lead to disagreement.
People we despise can’t persuade us. All the logic in the world won’t change our minds if we dislike the person being logical.
Advertising companies use celebrities and influencers to adulate the public to sell their products because we can be persuaded by the person we like and influenced by, also the non-public figure can be adulated, as a student by a teacher, patients by a doctor, wife by a husband and vice-versa.
Facts and statistics are good for business or solving some quant problems because statistics is just a number, and numbers are associated with maths and math is associated with facts, numbers and facts can’t change minds and perspective, and also statistics are obtained by taking a sample from a larger group and assuming the whole group has the same characteristics as the sample., and militate against the person with logic, what really works in the real world is emotional attachment and subjective statements.
If you have to or want to persuade someone to change their mind on the basis of facts and objectives, you must understand the person’s mind first, understand the position they’re on, how they reach the particular fact?, what made them agree on a particular statement and why they hold it, put yourself on the same position as there, see through their eyes, Then, and only then, have you done the work required to try and persuade someone else.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-24 | henry2023 | 66 | view |
2023-10-14 | graceeehgq | 66 | view |
2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 58 | view |
2022-12-19 | cbol | 50 | view |
2022-05-08 | Skittle_Mix07 | 50 | view |
- Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium substances essential for building and maintaining bones Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis a disease that is linked to both environmental and 60
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 80
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of childhood 60
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- In any enterprise the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...m, if one person is right but the troop is not agreeing on the fact presented by the person, he...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 414, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...hen, have you done the work required to try and persuade someone else.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86353944563 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64420350671 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518123667377 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 23.0359550562 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 153.014772689 60.3974514979 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 207.363636364 118.986275619 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.6363636364 23.4991977007 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196129114709 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814674017973 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655374811069 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882063371797 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585408879748 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 14.1392134831 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 11.2143820225 168% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.