Claim: The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In this fast moving world, many countries are ahead of the technological inventions in this 21st Century. Fast growing countries like the United States Of America has taken numerous steps towards being modernized both technologically and culturally. The emergence of Blogging as a new concept to express to the world has overpowered the standards to express. Social Media has significantly undermined the quality of political discourse in the United States.
The authors take on this claim may be considerable but has some disadvantages too. Publishing political opinions online may be efficient in some way, it could have some repercussions too. For instance, For electing a president from a political party, they organize a setup so that they deliver their message to the people of the United States about what they can do for our country. The elected representative having delivered a cogent speech increases his chance, which thereby, tweeting doesn't allows to do so.
Secondly, what about the people of the country having no Internet connection? How would they get to know about what's happening? Broadcasting it on a television comes to rescue, considering one has a television. People may be unwary about the advances that the world is taking but its not right to just tweet or post on social media.
In my opinion, both, publishing political opinions and covering new and political topics should happen. This may bolster both the views and produce results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | YASSINETURKI | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | p_keerthika | 50 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | afroza2 | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | afroza2 | 83 | view |
- Claim: The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political t 33
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of WLSS television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the s 83
- Do you Agree or disagree with following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 60
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a has taken numerous steps towards being modernized both technologically and cult...
^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ses his chance, which thereby, tweeting doesnt allows to do so. Secondly, what abo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
..., which thereby, tweeting doesnt allows to do so. Secondly, what about the people...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ction? How would they get to know about whats happening? Broadcasting it on a televis...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 236.0 442.535393258 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24152542373 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92303786972 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9458209089 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237826329904 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805531093522 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122879906362 0.0758088955206 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137877593322 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685161490887 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.