Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Every country consists of people from various cultures and traditions which constitute for the bio-diversity of the people. A country rich in bio-diversity of traditions is very rare and hence should be preserved. It is these various traditions and cultures that make a country different from other.
Cities act as one of the primary hotspots for cultural events and festivals. Ranging from Makar Sankranti to Durga Puja and to Christmas, India observes a broad spectrum of cultural fests, which is very uncanny. Other countries like Bali, London and Indonesia also see various festivals and events that tend to attract an unprecedented amount of crowd every year.
Organizing a cultural event requires a humungous amount of financial support as well as effort. These events help feel citizens a sense of unity among themselves. Government has a role to play in providing the local authorities organizing the event, with surplus funds. People, on the other hand, also contribute according to their reach, for the various cultural events that are organized in the locality.
With the help of these fests, the regional autonomy of the particular city is also enhanced. As more and more people come to witness the events, the local shopkeepers and businessmen are also benefited from this. People, after enjoying in these events, get very hungry and need a place to rest. The restraunts thus witness a huge inflow of customers, increasing their profit marginally. The nearby hotels also are benefited from the people who stay in their hotels room to be a part of the cultural event.
Cultural events attract much people from various parts of the country. Providing financial aid would thus prove to be beneficial for the government. The GDP would automatically get increased by a good margin and would help strengthen the roots of the economy.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infa 26
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 43
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f unity among themselves. Government has a role to play in providing the local au...
^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...tural event. Cultural events attract much people from various parts of the countr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74738461491 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526666666667 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0737037009 60.3974514979 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3888888889 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118655734421 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416649962022 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328051812545 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653929614286 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166484789539 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.