Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
I think scandals are a modern form of people saying to the government that one can do anything unethical lest they are caught red handed. Except from the laconic effects of government towards the society, the relentless bogus coverage of the mass media has also made the veracious truths of the society to hide deep inside a dark bubble, later to be exposed in the form of a detrimental scandal. But on the other hand, these scandals have helped people realize the non-gregarious nature of the government towards its citizens.
Owing to the reach and scalability of the media coverage, some of the important news gets easily swayed away from the people. People with myopic agendas tend to use these opportunities sedulously and ultimately get exposed in some scandals. The very recent 2G scam of India continued to evolve in a very small scale and due to lack of unprecedented evens like the above, was kept in dark, which later, eventually, came out as a scandal, forcing the government to act in a stringent manner.
Much of the popular speakers and reformers do not take pain in addressing the media about the smaller issues which, according to them, is a diversion in the path of information. One of the major reasons for these diabolical acts is the lack of spiciness in the news, which would ultimately fail to attract any audience. Furthermore, we, as an audience, never try to galvanize the efforts of small-scale reporters who try to bring these reports to the audience. For example, most of the news speakers tend to organize a debate among famous political figures for a discussion, that can easily be addressed by common people within an hour, which eventually ends up over a feud, resulting in complete loss of time.
The lack of the awareness of people and the casual approach of the speakers and reformers have led to a society filled with scandals, scandals which could have been shunned.
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infa 26
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the 51
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... and scalability of the media coverage, some of the important news gets easily swayed away ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a stringent manner" with adverb for "stringent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... scandal, forcing the government to act in a stringent manner. Much of the popular speakers and re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85932721713 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70744292153 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584097859327 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7888274112 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.454545455 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7272727273 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101385449687 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381797759932 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381324362318 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685632481493 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394687889872 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.