Claim: Group assignments that student must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture-based instruction in college and university course.
Reason: It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers to study a topic and to achieve common goal.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
Some people argue that studying in group assignment where students must cooperate to complete should substitute for the majority of traditional lecture-based instruction in college and university course, since gaining experience collaborating with peers to study a topic and purse the common goal play a significant role in students’ development. In my perspective, though the collaboration is important and essential, it cannot take over from the position of lectured-based instruction. I will provide my reasons in the following paragraph.
To begin with, students need fundamental theory to accomplish their purpose. Students need necessary knowledge to discover and explore the group assignment. For example, students in group want to build a machine learning model, like face recognition system, they need equip themselves with the knowledge with linear algebra, calculus, probability and some programming language, like python or R language. It’s true that their are some mature model in the Internet and students can just copy and paste to finish the project, but students can only learn a little from this group assignment. Lecture-base instruction is essential to develop students’ personal knowledge fields, is like teaching students how to build ship and how to manipulate the ship before they can explore the knowledge of sea.
Moreover, lecture-based instruction taught by experienced professors in college is the most reliable and quickest way to acquire knowledge and expand the horizon. Teacher with yeas of experience of teaching the same topics are familiar with the questions confusing the most students, and he or she can point out the imperative things that must acquire to master this topic. Even though there are many resources in the Internet to learn knowledge, like Coursera, Edx, MIT opencourseware and so on, listening and interacting with instructors in the class is the most efficient way to begin and master the new subjects.
Finally, focusing only one group assignment may cause vicious completion. Since the group assignment is the only method to justify whether the students is brilliant or not, some students may cheat and plagiarize the peers’ project. Students in the same group may argue about the contribution that attribute int the project, which just the opposite to what the group assignment wish, cooperation.
In conclude, although the group assignment plays critical role in students’ improvement, it cannot take over the lectured-base instruction in college and university course. Lecture-base instruction is the easiest way to acquire knowledge with the help of seasoned instructors. Without the lecture-base instruction, students may hard to achieve a outstanding group assignment due to the lack of back knowledge, and also may lead to a vicious competition
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-09 | Tammy__kk | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Ifthekhar | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | soap | 50 | view |
- The following letter is from a group of Linford College alumni to the chair of the art department at the college In a recent survey of college graduates 90 percent agreed that participating in an internship increase their chances of finding a job after gr 68
- Claim Group assignments that student must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university course Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers t 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 33
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to model'
Suggestion: to model
... group want to build a machine learning model, like face recognition system, they nee...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ke python or R language. It’s true that their are some mature model in the Internet a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...struction, students may hard to achieve a outstanding group assignment due to the...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, moreover, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5475638051 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10653359499 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515081206497 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.338953334 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.647058824 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3529411765 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394386579042 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126291403668 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899350600029 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224985372893 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099229431237 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.