Claim: imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: people who experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
Imagination is viewed as something that is more valuable than experience by a part of people for that could allow people to think without boundaries. And lots of human's invents pushing forward the world are inspired by scientists' imagination, especially in fields maintaining few precedent research in that no former experiences existed to render another way exploring these fields except for imagining. And imagination also should be more focused on education specially for kids than experiences, opening a gate leading to everywhere for children is important above all. But I am not denying the benefit and meaningful role played by experiences in our society, medical science, for example, a field prohibiting unconstrained imagination even it is at its early age.
Imagination is vital in areas people lack experiences, because there are no limitations that should be an acknowledged and uncontroverted rule, which usually are set up by people who firstly stepped into those unknown area. For example, Newton, a founder of classic physics whose theory was inspired by a fell apple, he harnessed his imagination to wonder why an apple on a tree could fall on a ground, that is a weird question, but that helped a word "gravity" to describe a special force attracting the apple falling. Newton could success because he used well about his imagination, and why he was not constricted by established rules because at that time, no rules existed at all. Hence, imagination plays a significant role in exploring new fields, giving scientists inspirations to deal with things. On contrary, situations could be inversed. Modern physics classes in even MIT and Caltech, where attracts the smartest students to study, also teach Newton's theory and do researches based on it. But professors there still use imagination to motivate them in the most pioneering field in physics. Thus, imagination or experience, no static answer to say which is better, but during innovating, imagination always prevails.
Except for pioneering fields, kid education is also a place to use imagination better than experience. Teachers have different background ranging from education experience, child life experience, relationship experience and so on. So it is difficult to assure experiences transmitted from teachers to kids are positive and educative. Educating only with books acts the same, books are well-organized, but it is too rigid for children to have their own habits. If teachers feed them only with books, it is like taking students' right of developing their own hobbies. Teachers' role, thus, should be a guilder and a monitor. They need to guild kids to solve open-ended problems on themselves, and do not strictly require them to figure out the correct answer, because the process of thinking is the most meaningful. What is more, they should encourage children to choose books that they like to read, as long as the topic they choose is positive. In China, the biggest developing country in the world, coding might be regarded as a formal and complicated subject in universities, while in USA, it is a hobby that even could be played by kids in primary school. As a result, imagination is comparatively highlighted in education for low-age, in that people at that age should be allowed to expand their purview to every tonic areas.
However, if we consider the importance of imagination and experience in other perspectives, positions mentioned before may not be true eternally. In medical science, even if in incipient phase, experience is far more than imagination. Because the cost of wrong trying is too great to undertake, medical companies spending years and millions of dollars on new drugs research is not anomaly, and even, sometimes seem to be dilatory. A very similar area compared to former mentioned area, low-age education, has a different situation. Institutions conducting teaching and focusing on bachelor education has predilection toward experience, in institutions like that, both have a similarity, that is having no research task and goals of fixing current veracious puzzles, like technical colleges or MBA programs in some universities. In such programs, case study is the first choice for teaching, rendering students diving in business cases resembling reality to help them develop abilities to solve problems. The program show practicality that not less contribute to society than do imagination, and it is wide-existing in business school, like business school in Harvard University and Western University in North America.
To sum up, measuring which of the two is more valuable is not easy, because the result is not fixed according to the volatile context. But one thing is sure is that, when we need to explore fully unknown fields, whare are no experiences for we to use, imagination is better, and if we just want to solve problems, experiences may work more efficiently.
- Claim imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason people who experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 75
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in o 68
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- The following appeared in a memo to the board ofdirectors ofBargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first productBargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Althoug 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...shing forward the world are inspired by scientists imagination, especially in fields maint...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 579, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... children is important above all. But I am not denying the benefit and meaningful role played ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agination even it is at its early age. Imagination is vital in areas people lac...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovating, imagination always prevails. Except for pioneering fields, kid educat...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd their purview to every tonic areas. However, if we consider the importance o...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d Western University in North America. To sum up, measuring which of the two is...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperiences may work more efficiently.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, except for, for example, as a result, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 45.0 19.5258426966 230% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 108.0 58.6224719101 184% => OK
Nominalization: 38.0 12.9106741573 294% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4139.0 2235.4752809 185% => OK
No of words: 786.0 442.535393258 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26590330789 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.29487408139 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04285619707 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 408.0 215.323595506 189% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519083969466 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1314.9 704.065955056 187% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 13.0 1.77640449438 732% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8727673054 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.516129032 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3548387097 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61290322581 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215713572218 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577088598197 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687511275856 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132235670426 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526987282667 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 209.0 100.480337079 208% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.