Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
In the society we live in, there are certainly some people we look up to. We admire them either because of their outstanding achievements or charming personalities. Nevertheless, the media's thirst for gossip and muck-racking tendencies often challenge the legacy of these figures. As far as I'm concerned, for public figures such as celebrities and politicians, it is no longer possible for a society to regard them as heroes if they've done something wrong. However, for those who operate behind the scenes such as scientists, their achievements and greatness can prevail since the media nowadays is simply not that interested in them.
Public figures are the most vulnerable to media scrutiny since they are the ones most exposed to the media. The group of celebrities, including movie stars and singers, is one example. Since their works are viewed by so many people in society and often idolized by teenagers, once they've committed wrongdoings and widely reported by media, it is almost impossible for them to be considered heroes again no matter how great their achievements are. People would feel cheated because their behaviors in front of the screen contradict with their actual deeds, and this discrepancy would only be intensified and increased after the media's exaggeration.
Politicians are also another group whose reputations are often blemished by the media and their legacies destroyed. Take Clinton as an example. Although he helped the U.S. recover its economy after the Cold War, he is unlikely to be regarded as a hero since news and articles about his affair with a White House intern was all over the place. Since politicians represent a country and its constituents, their deeds are also greatly scrutinized by the media to make sure they possess high moral standards.
Nevertheless, it is possible for society to regard successful scientists as heroes since their achievements lie in their advanced findings and contributions to society rather than individual public exposure. Since the mass media caters to the general audience, they are often unable to scrutinize the scientists' works. Thus, once scientists' findings are rigorously verified by academia, their status as heroes are decided. Even if the media attempts to diminish scientists' reputations, they often fail to do so. Take Einstein who is famous for his several affairs and Watson, the founder of DNA, who is known for being racist, as an example. If they were celebrities, they would be greatly criticized, yet they are considered heroic figures in society.
In conclusion, when it comes to public figures, I agree with the claim that it is no longer possible for a society to regard them as heroes since the media who are voracious for gossip will find ways to blemish their legacy. However, for people like scientists, they can still be regarded by heroes.
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 77
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 83
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 66
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... the legacy of these figures. As far as Im concerned, for public figures such as c...
^^
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...r a society to regard them as heroes if theyve done something wrong. However, for thos...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...y and often idolized by teenagers, once theyve committed wrongdoings and widely report...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2394.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17062634989 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81557978323 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520518358531 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5711962829 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0476190476 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269554282599 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787709936485 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072057930253 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171984546474 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769237569257 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.