Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.
I believe that the school should send only those who are talented in specific field to study in a foreign country.
Many opponents may argue that student exchanging not only broadens pupil's horizons but also offer an opportunity to learn different language. Undoubtedly, they certainly benefit little or more by the experience, however, not worth in terms of the cost. Obviously, the policy requires lots of money and efforts. For example, The essential cost, besides the tuition of the target school, additional expenses such as air-plane tickets, housing, car rental and other daily routine. Single student could spend three times as much as his or her original level. In taiwan, even the best public school, like national taiwan university, funded by government, is barely to send all students to a foreign nation. As for privates schools, they tend to give the chance for students, but require students to pay by themselves. therefore, If all of students are going to study abroad for one semester, it is not feasible for the tremendous cost.
Furthermore, I believe most students are not serious studying when they are in a foreign country for just one semester. There always exists diversity in students. some are diligent and some are indolent. some of them who hold a view of tourism may hang around and do not studying seriously. Thus, the obtained results are far away from the school's expectation.
only one semester is not adequate for a student to learn something deeply. For example, a formal universities master program usually requires students spending two to three years and even four to six years for doctor program. In other words, to master one academic field, one year is apparently insufficient. it turns out to be mere experience, not really engender remarkable insights. therefore, the gain would be limited.
In conclusion, the school should not send all students to study abroad for one semester, only those who are exceptionally talented in particular field are worthy to allocate the budget effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | AC1990 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | savikx | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dodo1212 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | prerak1113 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | sydneyness | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complexto its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towerscomplex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to 55
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to work in a large company than in a small one. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Playing and WinningDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing a game is fun only when you win.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In an effort to bring new jobs to Dillton and stimulate the city s flagging economy Dillton s city council voted last year to lower the city s corporate tax rate by 15 percent at the same time the city began offering generous relocation grants to any comp 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic field to study in a foreign country. Many opponents may argue that student ex...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 816, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... require students to pay by themselves. therefore, If all of students are going to study ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...re always exists diversity in students. some are diligent and some are indolent. som...
^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ome are diligent and some are indolent. some of them who hold a view of tourism may ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
... obtained results are far away from the schools expectation. only one semester is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
...r away from the schools expectation. only one semester is not adequate for a stud...
^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...d, one year is apparently insufficient. it turns out to be mere experience, not re...
^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ot really engender remarkable insights. therefore, the gain would be limited. In conclu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17469879518 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73359097095 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1247898546 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247298964159 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656919681034 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606541001 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142711904423 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244021791412 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.