Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
.
Criticism of any work is any important part of the evaluation system. It is the job of the critics to point out the flaws of any kind of work and thus enable its further development. In our current society where people have quick access to information and with the aid of social networking sites such as Facebook, it has become very easy for almost anyone to express their views in any subject. The prompt mentions a need for the critics to be an expert in the concerned field in order for the criticism to be of any value. There is some merit to this notion but it is not entirely acceptable for the three reasons.
To begin, it is not possible for everyone to be an expert on everything. But that does not mean that they do not have the right or ability to express their own views on any matter. For instance, in Bangladesh floods are a common phenomenon during the rainy season. Due to the numerous rivers scattered throughout the country, people have to face extremely difficult situations during the rainy season. The problems are exacerbated when dams are damaged by the floods and water enters into the homes of the people who live in low lying areas. During this situation, the local people can be seen criticizing the government officials and local representatives for their ineptness. The news and media channels make a wide coverage of these criticisms. The people are not an expert in flood control, but that does not mean that their sufferings are not real and that their opinions hold no value. Since they are the ones suffering year after year they have the utmost right to express their troubles. So, although they are not experts, their opinions do matter.
Furthermore, it might be possible for someone who is not an expert in the field to give a proper and useful analysis of the subject. For instance, a student with a degree in life sciences might be interested about paintings and learns about them at his own free will. So, it is possible for him to give an analysis about any painting which creates interest in his mind. Although he might not be an expert in painting, he might have the capabilities of explaining a painting in detail. Again, you don't have to be an expert to see that construction workers have done a lousy job on making roads when the roads break down after just a year of construction without any mentionable disasters.
Again, expert opinion is a must in many cases. For instance, for any kind of medical problems, it is a must to take the advice from doctors. If people do not take advice from the medical experts and instead opt for self medication, it might cause more problems and increase the severity of the disease.
In conclusion, it is expected that criticism and analysis must come from experts of the field. But it is not at all feasible to disregard the opinions of the non experts because everyone is entitled to having their own opinions. Whether, the criticism should be taken lightly or strongly often depends on the situation and also the quality of criticism delivered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 58
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wit 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 54
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
. Criticism of any work is any important...
^
Line 2, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people have quick access to information and with the aid of social networking si...
^^
Line 4, column 496, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...aining a painting in detail. Again, you dont have to be an expert to see that constr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...r any kind of medical problems, it is a must to take the advice from doctors. If people...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2503.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 536.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6697761194 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5636594957 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466417910448 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0258789878 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2692307692 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221959743077 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640024584144 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577654402552 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128542220548 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471110569638 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.