Critical judgement of any work deals with its detailed analysis that gives the report of the work being prosaic or worthy of appreciation. Criticism of any work in any field is important as it brings about the cogency and degree of precision of the work. So it is necessary that the critical analysis be done by the expert in the field so as to enhance the points which cannot be observed by a laymen. So my opinion that the critical judgement be provided by a work in a field is affirmative.
Firstly, a laymen, or the one who is not expert in the field would only be capable of analyzing the superficial matters of the work and would not be able to find deep implications of the work due to lack of profound knowledge. As for example for an art work such as a painting or a sculpture, a n expert would be able to appraise the work and would be able to analyze the work in detail. The expert would be knowing what an abstract painting would represent while on the other hand for a laymen it would just be a piece of some drawing and the judgement would be on the basis of similarity with the real life as a laymen would lack artistic imagination.
Secondly, an expert knows much about a subject as he/she has gone through a lot of study through out his/her life, while on the other hand a laymen would just have a superficial knowledge of the subject and so their analysis might not be credible. It can even be quoted that
'A little knowledge is harmful'
For example, in the field of car design a laymen would only be able to opine about the looks of the car and how beautiful it looks or how sleek the design is? But a laymen would not be able to appreciate and give reason about the sleekness or a particular kind of design. While an expert would be knowing that sleekness decreases the drag force which brings about an increase in the fuel efficiency of the car as well as the looks of the car.
Finally, it is always not important that only the judgement of the experts are correct in a field. For example for a critical analysis of the book, it is possible that the expert is subjective and likes the book because of some part that the expert would have a propensity for. While on the contrary a laymen would dislike the book and the other readers may also either like or dislike a book. So sometimes when the criticism is subjective, there are problems both on the expert's side and the laymen side to judge the work.
To sum up, these are the points which leads me to follow the statement and consider it to be affirmative.
- When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park's parking lots last month revealed the park's drop in popularity: 79
- Argument Type - The following appeared on the Mozart School of Music Web site. "The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons. First of all, the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at a 29
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 50
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; t 83
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ysis be done by the expert in the field so as to enhance the points which cannot be obse...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
... the points which cannot be observed by a laymen. So my opinion that the critical judgem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
... in a field is affirmative. Firstly, a laymen, or the one who is not expert in the fi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dge. As for example for an art work such as a painting or a sculpture, a n expert...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ork such as a painting or a sculpture, a n expert would be able to appraise the ...
^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ze the work in detail. The expert would be knowing what an abstract painting would represe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
...d represent while on the other hand for a laymen it would just be a piece of some drawin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
...sis of similarity with the real life as a laymen would lack artistic imagination. Sec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
... he/she has gone through a lot of study through out his/her life, while on the other hand a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
...t his/her life, while on the other hand a laymen would just have a superficial knowledge...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be credible. It can even be quoted that A little knowledge is harmful For exa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 41, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
...For example, in the field of car design a laymen would only be able to opine about the l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 164, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
...t looks or how sleek the design is? But a laymen would not be able to appreciate and giv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 295, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...r kind of design. While an expert would be knowing that sleekness decreases the drag force...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 301, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
...a propensity for. While on the contrary a laymen would dislike the book and the other re...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as for, as to, for example, kind of, as well as, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37473684211 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45833986728 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.393684210526 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4630245998 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6875 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.21951772744 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177526855142 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823668349101 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434658702627 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927853948457 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537453341971 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 12.1743820225 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.66 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.