Scientific research represents two side of a single coin. Government should first perform a critical analysis of the research topic before restricting the scientific research. Scientific research and development leads the world to either dystopia or utopia. So my opinion about the interests of the government in restricting the scientific research in some cases is affirmative.
Firstly, a scientific research may lead to development and it makes the life of people much easier but on the other hand some research projects are very dangerous and may lead the world to dystopia. For illustration the most tragic moment in the history of science and world politics is the development of the atomic bomb which took a death toll of a large number of people. Government should have kept certain restriction in such cases because the goal of science research and development should not be the destruction of the world and the human civilization who has developed it.
Secondly, the scientific research in the development of automobile vehicles has with no doubt benefit the people on the earth but on the other hand it has spread colossal amounts of carbon and nitrogen gases in the atmosphere damaging and perturbing the ecosystem in which various species of flora and fauna nurtures. Government restriction in this case has targeted toward the decrease in the use of fossil fuel and increase in the use of renewable sources of energy.
On the contrary, Restrictions leads to the fettering of the freedom of action of the various organization which hinders the progress in the field of science and technology. For example Suppose a small private rocket company wants to research on whether the use of nuclear fuel provides efficiency or not, the government restriction in this case would be in the form of rejection in providing the nuclear fuel or denying the use of nuclear fuel in that case the government restriction ceases scientific research.
Finally, It is very good if the government denies some activities in the field to prevent the engendering of destruction. To sum up government should restrict the research if it is found in some case that its result might impact the earth and its life form in a wrong way.
- When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park's parking lots last month revealed the park's drop in popularity: 79
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of a company that specializes in the delivery of heating oil."Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for he 37
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; t 83
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study repor 52
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t in restricting the scientific research in some cases is affirmative. Firstly...
^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... atomic bomb which took a death toll of a large number of people. Government should have kept cer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ight impact the earth and its life form in a wrong way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, no doubt, in some cases, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08967391304 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87930530563 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467391304348 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.9543347907 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.076923077 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3076923077 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 5.21951772744 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188092572019 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768517834162 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327448170775 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112393453392 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320710381144 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.