Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Along with the technology developing, people find the world become more complex beyond their own knowledge. People would like to ask others to provide opinions and suggestions for the unknown field. Some people would prefer to get help from experts other than tyros in a field, as they consider tyros would provide less valuable judgement than experts. After weigh the advantages and disadvantages between suggestions from experts and non-specialists, I mostly disagree with the author's opinion. As I consider the experts also have their limits and tyros could have brilliant critical judgement as well, contingent upon the different specific circumstance.
Admittedly, experts are admired and applauded as their rich experiences accumulated for years, experts have the fame of judgement and society works in a way which rely on their suggestions and policies. Nevertheless, one who works only in one or two fields would has his own limits as he may not has time to work in other fields, sometimes the opinion may not always right. Take president Hoover as an example. Hoover failed to help America recovery from the economic depression, as he insisted the market would recovery by itself without government interfere. However, his judgement on this issue was proved to be wrong after he was replaced by president Roosevelt. Accordingly, even the crucial people in a field would have wrong judgement as their limits and simple persistence.
Furthermore, tyros could also contribute excellent crucial judgement in some specific circumstances. For instance, one enterprise needs to launch a commercial champion target at young group. Compare an expert who accumulated ten years experiences and a tyro intern who just graduated from school, apparently the young person would have better judgement on this champion plan, as he would be more familiar with the mindset and trends among young groups. In this case, the experiences of the experts would generate huge generation gap with the target group, but the tyro would be the better choice. Besides the specific young fashion area, young leaders are generally considered to have more enthusiasm and willing for revolutionary, this is one of the crucial reasons for enterprise and politician in different fields would prefer to change their leadership after a period of time.
To conclusion, the weight of critical judgement from both specialists and non-specialists should be considered twice before one takes others' opinion, what's more important, one should have the ability of critical thinking to tell which judgement is considerable or not, but not only the opinion's origin.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-28 | AlexandraWei | 50 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | AlexandraWei | 50 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 70
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds. 75
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds. 83
- [Claim] Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. [Reason] Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds. [Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disa 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...specialists, I mostly disagree with the authors opinion. As I consider the experts also...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...o works only in one or two fields would has his own limits as he may not has time t...
^^^
Line 5, column 866, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...efer to change their leadership after a period of time. To conclusion, the weight of critic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... twice before one takes others opinion, whats more important, one should have the abi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opinions'' or 'opinion's'?
Suggestion: opinions'; opinion's
...s considerable or not, but not only the opinions origin.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38498789346 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86165769602 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510895883777 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3953246324 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.823529412 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2941176471 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152244124844 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052233589874 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380967500796 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985382575798 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337905823821 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.