Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Author’s claim that “Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field” holds some merit as amateur person will not able excavate discerning details from the people’s work. In my opinion, author’s claim holds credibility and following are the reasons for my accordance.
Firstly, Consider art’s realm, where through painting, dancing, signing, etc. artists represents his/her point of view. It might happen that amateur fails to understand what artists want to convey and might give wrong judgment. Thus, judgment given by expert should be considered as correct because wrong judgment given by amateur may discourage the artists and impede artist’s growth. Arts is realm, in which, most of people fail to recondite what artist want to represent, general people will able to value arts if experts aid general people to understand arts.
Secondly, there is plethora of examples, where judgment of experts is considered over some amateur. In schools there are various sports, cultural, etc. events, for judging such events experts are called who is properly acquainted with the knowledge in particular field instead of letting teachers judge such events. This example is best examples where people are tendentious towards the critical judgment made by experts. Experts are the persons who have acquired plenary knowledge in specific field and their judgment might actually change the perspective of people related to one’s work. Thus, judgment given by them is taken seriously by people. Consider another example, if any person is sick, will he ask his friends for prescriptions or doctor? Consider another example, if a person wants to decor hi/her house with certain budget, he/she will ask to his/her relatives about which material to be used or decor assistant? These are the examples which determine the behavior of people, who values the judgment made by experts rather than amateur.
For movie ratings, there are numerous websites, which rates the movie in scale of 5. Do people take those rating seriously? No, People will learn the ratings given by movie critics, because movie critics through their knowledge make discerning statements which are convincing enough for people. Statements made by movie critics will change the perspective hold by people about the movie. Thus, It is experts statement that hold importance regarding acknowledging any work.
On wrapping up, experts are the person who is abreast in his/her field and it is expert’s judgment that holds credence for people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 66
- Governments should place few, if any, restriction on scientific research and development 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty. 50
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the internet seem to offer schools improved method for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...apos;s growth. Arts is realm, in which, most of people fail to recondite what artist want to r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udgment that holds credence for people.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43137254902 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.661827898 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.8792650898 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.727272727 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329327540145 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841614842054 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107621672241 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192745937566 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10685461388 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.