Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
From the beginning of educational development, the system emphasized on helping students to pursue their dreams and be successful on their path. That is why, almost all the institutions focus on teaching and educating students relentlessly and with no obligations. Furthermore, education should be facilitated in such a way that allows students to try different subjects and learn about different fields. Historically, this method seems to be the most influential way to help people follow their dreams or find their new passions.
I strongly believe that schools should not dissuade students from studying the fields that they might not be successful on. This gives the institutions an unnecessary power to decide for one’s future, especially since no one has the ability to predict the future. Schools’ mission statement should prevent any teacher or instructor preventing students from doing or trying something new. Albert Einstein was a high school drop out because the principal made a decision that Einstein is incapable of handling school material and is unable to continue his education. However, the school failed to realize and discover Einstein talents, thus, they were unable to provide Einstein with adequate materials that allow him discover his passion. That is why the academic institutions should never decide the future of a student by persuading or dissuading them from following a specific field. However, it should be the other way. Rather than interfering with people’s decisions, Institutions should only provide an opportunity for everyone to try different subjects and discover their talents. They should facilitate an environment that focuses on educational motivations and learning opportunities. Schools are the only places where students can switch between different subjects and areas, and learn which path they are gravitating toward. Furthermore, I am partially supportive of the idea of making students try fields that they are not interested in. I love how undergraduate schools, make general subject classes as requirements for graduation. This should motivate the students to step out of their comfort zone and learn about topics that they never get the opportunity to learn.
Here therefore, having said all the reasons why I agree with the topic, there are going to be some people who are going to detract my argument. Sometimes students pick a random subject and try to continue on that path. However, there might a counselor who is an expert in his/her field and strongly believes that a particular student will be more successful in a different path and the student is not aware of the alternatives. In these situation, students may or may not benefit from the school attempts to dissuade them from a field of study with the hopes of better achievements. However, even in these situation, the school’s power of dissuasion someone from something should be limited.
Therefore, in general, schools should avoid dissuading students from pursuing a field of study solely because there is a chance that the student might not succeed. However, what schools can do is to provide students with all materials and resources that one might need, in order to make sure students are aware of their decisions’ consequences and are able to find the right path in order for their future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir dreams or find their new passions. I strongly believe that schools should n...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 432, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'these situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; these situations
...nt is not aware of the alternatives. In these situation, students may or may not benefit from t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 601, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'these situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; these situations
...f better achievements. However, even in these situation, the school's power of dissuasion ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2831.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34150943396 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92668210404 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477358490566 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 852.3 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2268242976 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.958333333 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183456802746 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606204070896 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507919218852 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12142729407 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182607539387 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.