Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely succeed. Write a response in which you discuss to what extent you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting y

Education is one of the most imprtants parts of someones life. It is where anyone of us spend more than 15 years in this situation to get as much knowledge as we can. Some believe that schools and collages are responsible to stop students continuing studies that are suitable for them, while others go with the opposite direction. In my view, sure, it is the role of educational institutions do that for two very important reasons.

First, there is enough time to convince student and prepare them to stop studiying fields that they are not interested in. At least, anyone will study twelve years through his life, and within this period school can help students to determine the subjects that they are not doing well with them, and then students can find alternative field to focus on and pursue. For example, I know a public figue called Tariq Swaidan, a professor from kuwait. He got the phd from Penn state university in Petroluin Engineering, and while his graduate studies the university advisor noticed that he is veru influencial on other people, and has a great effect. So, they adivsed him to change to stand up talks to talk and encourage others, who later on become a public figuer in this field, and he forgetted the original major i.e Petrolueim engineering. That is how the university has a great role to guid students to the suitable fields.

Second, there are so many alternatives available in fornt of the student while he is still studying. Every educational establishment has a big variety of specializations in it, and if a student noticed another major that is more suitable for him, he can choose from more than one choice with the help of the instructors there. To illustrate this, in my university (JUST) there are more than 50 different majors that any student choud transfer to within the first year of study. And for each major, there is an academic advisor that determine the elegability of students who want to change major. Moreover, sometimes these adivsers hold some meetings to group students according to recent academic results, and then determine the most suitable field for each group. That how the availability of other major in the same place help student to select the best field.

On the other hand, some will contend that this job is not the educational institute job, it is the student job with his family because they are the most close to him and they know him more than anybody else. The rebuttal for them is that family don't have the enough experience and academic knowledge to guide their relevant in selecting the most suitable field. And if they do, they will be responsible for that for the rest of his life and maybe will occure some personnal problems with some of the family memebers because of this decision. So this point is not accepted regarding the family role.

In sum, it is obvious that the role for helping students not to pursue with the wrong fields is for the educational institutes, not only bacuase there is enough time to do their job, but also hence there is high chance to select among different fields availabe, and the this role is not acceptable to be done by the family at all. The future of our students sould be strongly managed by specialists because students are our treasure.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Education is one of the most imprtants p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that for two very important reasons. First, there is enough time to convince ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uid students to the suitable fields. Second, there are so many alternatives a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp student to select the best field. On the other hand, some will contend tha...
^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e. The rebuttal for them is that family dont have the enough experience and academic...
^^^^
Line 7, column 492, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ill occure some personnal problems with some of the family memebers because of this decisio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accepted regarding the family role. In sum, it is obvious that the role for ...
^^^
Line 9, column 270, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...ct among different fields availabe, and the this role is not acceptable to be done by th...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, then, well, while, at least, for example, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2700.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 567.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7619047619 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87972968509 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53538854121 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47266313933 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.77640449438 619% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6152226089 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.727272727 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7727272727 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.59090909091 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15892490708 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496888164914 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307158554388 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999367614124 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124810279058 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.