Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.

Essay topics:

Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.

Surely it is not uncommon that education through well-known facts results in effective learning and development of a student. Such facts help students understand various topics and concepts in the course of their curriculum in a better way. However, if the students are not familiar with the basics of the concerned facts that educators attempt to convey, they might not be able to understand the significance of other related concepts relevant to these facts. Thus, I would strongly agree with the suggestion that educators should teach facts only after the students have understood all the concepts and ideas that form the basis of such facts. I would like to argue in favor of the above stated suggestion because of four reasons.
To begin with, if an educator teaches a fact that the student has no basic knowledge about, then it might result in incomplete understanding of the subject. Since the student has never come across the domain of the concerned fact earlier, he may not completely understand the relevance of the fact and the significance of various concepts that it involves. For example, consider an educator teaching students about the fact that, before the early 17th century, it was considered that the earth is at the center of the solar system and the sun and all the other planets revolve around the earth. A student who has no idea regarding the significance of this fact might attribute the reason behind this to the lack of technology and scientific development in that era. However, the true reason behind this was the religious beliefs of orthodox and dogmatic people of that era, who opposed Galileo’s cosmological model despite scientific evidence being available. The student will thus, develop an unsound convention in his mind. The above example illustrates that a student might sometimes misinterpret or may develop an incomplete understanding of a few ideas if he or she does not have any knowledge about the fundamentals of the fact.
Further, even if we assume that the teaching of facts without the students having the knowledge of basic concepts does not result in incomplete understanding, there are several other reasons that need to be discussed. Firstly, Students ‘enjoy’ studying such facts whose basic concepts and ideas are familiar to them. It is imperative that they find such topics easy to go on with because they are accustomed to the details relevant to the respective fact. For instance, consider an educator edifying his students about the fact that the risk of investment in stock market is directly proportional to the amount of money invested. A student who has studied the concepts of stock market investment risk might enjoy learning about the concerned fact since he is already familiar with all the axioms of stock market investment. Such a student may find it easy to understand all the points that the instructor is trying to convey as compared to a student who has no knowledge of stock markets. This illustrates that students seek pleasure in studying facts they are already familiar with, which causes them to study the concerned topic by putting all their heart and soul in it.
Lastly, students with strong fundamentals and an informed knowledge base are at an advantage of developing good analytical skills. Students who have previously studies the concepts, trends and ideas surrounding the fact can think for themselves and analyse the fact from all possible angles rather than just simply accepting what is professed by the educator. For example, a fact like, the modern technological devices makes use of microprocessors rather than traditional circuit boards, might cause individuals with a good knowledge base to question the reason behind this argument. Rather than simply accepting what was taught by the educator, the students can think about what different component does a microprocessor have that makes it more effective over traditional circuit boards? Students are able to develop a strong sense of reasoning if they are taught facts whose fundamental concepts are clear to them. They are able to remember such facts for a longer time as compared to the ‘uninformed’ students and are also able to incot the applications of such facts in everyday life.
One might argue that educators might waste a lot of time if they were to teach right from the basics. In that case, it might be possible to ask students to learn about the basics as a part of their assignments or home work. Examining various factors and arguments involved with the given suggestion, it is clear that students are likely to be benefited if educators teach them facts after they are familiar with the relevant concepts and ideas. They are likely to enjoy what they learn and understand its significance in practical day-to-day life.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-11 bhavya_vasudeva 50 view
2019-12-31 Sumaiya Mila 50 view
2019-11-17 faatir 50 view
2019-11-17 faatir 50 view
2019-10-29 arubhardwaj 54 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificance in practical day-to-day life.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, regarding, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.3162921348 256% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 117.0 58.6224719101 200% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4032.0 2235.4752809 180% => OK
No of words: 790.0 442.535393258 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10379746835 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.30159774456 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83174034913 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403797468354 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1241.1 704.065955056 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6324113517 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.034482759 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2413793103 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34482758621 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3134770109 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097488691548 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729379288668 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205007497594 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797872660091 0.0667264976115 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 100.480337079 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.