First step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar
Self-knowledge is the best knowledge as it is a building block of success. A mentor or guide may help a person develop certain awarness or knowledge, but the knowledge and skill acquired through own research, interest and diligence lasts long. Often, we hear a lot of news or facts or rather cliche, and those facts just capture our mind and we assume that piece of information to be true undoubtedly. Such trite may prove out to be negative in long run, so I mostly agree with the recommendation that first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.
Many people belives in the familiarity too and try to built up of knowledge on the base of known facts. This had proven to be advantageous as well in the past. For instance, if we take early human-beings, they came to earth, unaware of any resources or way to survive. With passing time, a lot of resources were discovered and generation after generation, people tried to improvise it. Such familiarity with the information of resource and facts such as water, fire or vegetation are some facts which helped the coming generation to acquire more and more knowledge and sustain their life on earth in a better way. But, there could be lot of information that have been passed years after years and they may be based on false beliefs or improper investigations, accepting such information without any proper research can be deleterious too.
Very often we hear some trite from our grandparents or parents and believe in them without any of our own research and then we think of self-knowledge, our mind becomes reluctant to accept any of such informations because such fact are ingraved in our brain, so without we study or research, such false or wrong familiarity hinders our process of self-knowledge. Suppose, if someone right from your childhood taught you certain mathematical formula, take for instance pythagoras theorm, your mind and soul just accepted that formula without your own knowledge or investigation and going forward if you are doing any research in the field related, say traingles, your mind will always want to apply our known knowledge about pythagoras theorm in every possible place and as you acquire the understanding that it cannot be applied at all the places, it will be difficult for you to accept it. That is why its often said that whenever you are doing any research work, or starting the investigation, clear off your mind and start from level one with impartial mind.
While some acquired and passed on information are true and may help us to built us our foundation better, it may hinder our development with the new findings and discoveries in place. So, in conclusion it familiarity about certain resources or tools might help a person to get a zest of any topic but may impede their growth, so I mostly agree to the recommendation of clearing off and rejecting the familiar before starting any process of self-knowledge, to gain knowledge better with an impartial and fresh mind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-27 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ataraxia-m | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics wil 66
- First step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 66
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88362919132 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89891044848 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.813281095 60.3974514979 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.066666667 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 23.4991977007 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207025362551 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841041383643 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119600259455 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150993657722 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105377192014 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.1392134831 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.