Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
Education is one of the utmost importance and crucial part of any person’s life. It is responsible for shaping their career as well as their personality and their view on life as a whole. It is debatable whether in reality education limit our scope of imagination rather than broadening it. Although the concern is natural, in reality it depends upon the individual itself how they chose to cultivate the knowledge acquired through education.
The purpose of the above statement is to bridge the discussion of the purpose of the education and the role that the recipient plays in it. Formal education is meant to provide a solid foundation in the career or field the person has resolved to follow. It also serves as an example of what has worked in the past and which are the most lucrative paths to a successful career. To further illustrate my point, take an example of current statistics given by ministry of human resources in India which states that the students who follow through formal education are more eighty percent more likely to achieve what they desire and bring innovation to the society.
Taking into account the time and ardor it takes to complete a former education, it exposes people to richness of their society and environment. Most of the creative writers have undergone some kind of formal education. Those who didn’t, which is actually quite rare, had their exceptional imagination to compensate for it. Shakespeare, Steinbeck, Wordsworth and innumerable other novelist were wonderous in their mind and spirit which is apparent in their works. It is, thus, undoubtable that formal education itself restrain the creative mind of humankind but rather the temperament of the person itself.
Formal education, especially in modern capitalist society, is also culprit of luring students into a rat race of which extinguishes their originality. Few known individuals like Bill Gates had dropped out of their college mid way to pursue their own interests and they did it quite successfully too. But these individuals, possessing the kind of finesse and aptitude essential to break through, are few and far between. People who take this route are generally more likely to end up worse. Undeniably, it should be evident the persona of an individual is more likely to restrict his own spirit than a laid down routine of learning.
Consequently, it is apparent that formal education itself is not the actual culprit for curbing the creative mind or spirit of an individual but rather the mentality of the person itself shackles his ingenious spirit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Himanshu Sharma | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aish | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | tulipkatie | 83 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 79
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 81
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, so, thus, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11820330969 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80474909487 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8999418803 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.947368421 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190836601969 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584799298461 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072813894998 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116993598369 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558044185254 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.