Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
Education is one of the utmost importance and crucial part of any person’s life. It is responsible for shaping someone’s career as well as the personality and the view on life as a whole. It is debatable whether in reality education limit our scope of imagination rather than broadening it. Although the concern is natural, in reality it depends upon the individual itself how they chose to cultivate the knowledge that they acquire through education.
The purpose of the above statement is to bridge the discussion of the purpose of the education and the role that the recipient plays in it. Formal education is meant to provide a solid foundation in the career or field the person has resolved to follow. It also serves as an example of what has worked in the past and which are the most lucrative paths to a successful career. To further illustrate my point, take an example of current statistics given by ministry of human resources in India which states that the students who follow through formal education are more eighty percent more likely to achieve success and bring innovation to the society.
Taking into account the time and ardor it takes to complete a former education, it exposes people to richness of the society and environment. Most of the creative writers have undergone some kind of formal education. Those who didn’t, which is actually quite rare, had an exceptional imagination to compensate for it. Shakespeare, Steinbeck, Wordsworth and innumerable other novelist who penned down some of the most extraordinary and revered screenplay had formal education. It is, thus, undoubtedly that formal education itself does not restrain the creative mind of humankind but rather the temperament of the person itself.
Formal education, especially in modern capitalist society, is also culprit of luring students into a rat race of which extinguishes their originality. Few known individuals like Bill Gates had dropped out of their college mid way to pursue their own interests and they did it quite successfully too. But these individuals, possessing the kind of finesse and aptitude essential to break through, are few and far between. Those who take this route are far more likely to end up worse. In light of these evidences, it should be evident that a person is more likely to be restricted by his own persona rather than a laid down routine of study.
Consequently, it is apparent that formal education itself is not the actual culprit for curbing the creative mind or spirit of an individual but rather the mentality of the person itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Himanshu Sharma | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aish | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | tulipkatie | 83 | view |
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 80
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 79
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 70
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 70
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss and bring innovation to the society. Taking into account the time and ardor i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, so, thus, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07259953162 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85340677909 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526932084309 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4780090536 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184698983676 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549589740993 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703393404795 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110063519723 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497505384078 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.